Peer Review History: Knowledge of Safe Period and Utilization of Long-Lasting Reversible Contraceptives among Female Adolescents in an Urban City in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Disha Geriya, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Eze Shadrach Chinecherem, University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(3) Sherly Shulamite Nelapati, Christian Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Disha Geriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eze Shadrach Chinecherem, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sherly Shulamite Nelapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Sugarcane Cultivation in Thiuvannamalai District of Tamil Nadu, India – A Socio-economic Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ereneus K Marbaniang, India.

(2) Hassane Benlaghrissi, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ereneus K Marbaniang, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hassane Benlaghrissi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Extractants for Determination of Micronutrients in Soils of South Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shukri I. Rekani, Iraq.

(2) N. U. S. Dissanayake, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Vinod Kumar Dubey, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shukri I. Rekani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. U. S. Dissanayake, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Remkan Distribution and Its Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Haitham Fawzy, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Abd-Elnaser Saad A. R., Cairo Uinversity, Egypt.

(3) Ahmed A. Al-Rubaiee, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shanker, Assam University, India.

(2) Zainab Shawky El-Khalifa, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haitham Fawzy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abd-Elnaser Saad A. R., Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahmed A. Al-Rubaiee, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Siquian City’s Exporting of Goods: Competitiveness and Survival Analysis Amidst Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Adina Dornean, Associate Professor, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Prof. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(3) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Murugan, University of Madras, India.

(2) G. Babu Rao, Dr. Abdul Haq Urdu University, India.

(3) Derick S. Figueroa, College of Business and Accountancy, Tarlac State University, Philippines.

(4) Oksana Bondar-Pidgurska, Higher Educational Institution of Ukoopspilka, “Poltava University of Economics and Trade”, Ukraine.

(5) Farha Fatma, Gossner College, Ranchi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sujata Baruah, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Murugan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Babu Rao, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Derick S. Figueroa, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Oksana Bondar-Pidgurska, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Farha Fatma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Plants Used in the Traditional Treatment of Female Infertility in Kita, Mali

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Iana Malasevskaia, Yemen.

(2) Gulmira Derbissalina, Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Adeyemi Odumeru, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.

(2) Ayesha Mushtaq, SBK Women’s University, Pakistan.

(3) Dhanaraj Singh Thokchom, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(4) Paul Andrew Bourne, VTDI, Jamaica.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A. S. Ansari, University of Rajasthan, India.

(2) Bhanumati Sarkar, Acharya Prafulla Chandra College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iana Malasevskaia, Yemen) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gulmira Derbissalina, Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Farming Systems for Environment Sustainability: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia and Institute of Construction and Transport Infrastructure, Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dorothy Medza Tsuma, Management University of Africa, Kenya.

(2) Kennedy Sean M Kalundu, University of Namibia, Namibia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorothy Medza Tsuma, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kennedy Sean M Kalundu, Namibia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Project-oriented Problem-based Learning (POPBL) in Manufacturing Product Design for Vocational Higher Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shaharior Rahman Razu, Associate Professor, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Nguyen Quynh Thy, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ton DucThang University, Vietnam.

(2) Khritish Swargiary, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Satyanath Reddy Kodidala, JJMMC, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nguyen Quynh Thy, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khritish Swargiary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: English Language Problems and Communication Competence of Students: The Mediating Role of Smartphone Apps in ESL Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Arief Ertha Kusuma, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Indonesia.

(2) Aneesya Sharma, Institute of Business Management, GLA University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arief Ertha Kusuma, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aneesya Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA