Peer Review History: Influence of Foliar Application of Growth Stimulants and Fungicides on Seed Yield and Quality in Soybean

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manal Hadi Ghaffoori Kanaan, Technical Institute of Suwaria, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anupriti Mala, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) H Manoranjan Sharma, Waikhom Mani Girls’ College, India.

(3) Vikas K Guleria, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pegah Mohaghegh, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Amit A. Shahane, Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Uma Dutta, Cotton Unuiversity, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manal Hadi Ghaffoori Kanaan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge Assessment of Beneficiary Farmers of Technical Service Centres (TSCs) about Recommended Technologies of Sericulture in Karnataka State of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Edward Ching-Ruey, Luo, Associate Professor, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanketh, C. V., ICAR, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) Prasanta Kumar Kar, India.

(3) Zeyad Jameel Al-Saedi, National Center for Water Resources Managements, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanketh, C. V., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prasanta Kumar Kar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zeyad Jameel Al-Saedi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Summer Forage Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) to Spacing and Seed Rate

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Nda Ainika, Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(2) Shahram Gilaninia, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benjamin Aboagye Danso, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Ghana.

(2) Elakiya, N, TNAU, India.

(3) Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iran.

(4) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia.

(5) Jangorzo Salifou Nouhou, Université Dan Dicko Dankoulodo de Maradi, Niger.

(6) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jaime Thissen, USA.

(2) Manju Sharma, Amity University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Nda Ainika, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahram Gilaninia, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Nutrient Sources on Yield, Nutrient Content and Uptake of Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) in Organic Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Degdo Suprayitno, Institut STIAMI, Indonesia.

(2) I Ketut Ngawit, Mataram University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ghada Mostafa Kattmah, Syria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Degdo Suprayitno, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (I Ketut Ngawit, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Genetic Diversity and Drought-Tolerance Characteristics of Few Rice Varieties Using Morphological and Molecular Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abdullah Ali Majrashi, Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Desrina YusiIrawati, Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Abdullah Ali Majrashi, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Desrina YusiIrawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modern Phenotyping: A Paradigm of Present Need in Crop Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son Levent, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Myrtel S. Bernardo, Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology, Bulacan Agricultural State College, Philippines.

(2) Robert Eric, University of Orleans, France.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Shanmugapriya, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Myrtel S. Bernardo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Robert Eric, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Evaluation of Anti-hyperlipidemic Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Coccinia grandis Leaves in High Fat Induced Rodent Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V. V. Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alpna Mathur, Government Medical College, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

(2) Bishnu Choudhury, North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Homoeopathy, India.

(3) Pavan Kumar Yanamadala, Aditya Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rodney Itaki, Papua New Guinea.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alpna Mathur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bishnu Choudhury, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pavan Kumar Yanamadala, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Alpelisib Efficacy in Advanced Breast Cancer

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kunal Raut, RSM’s N. N. Sattha College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Snjezana Ramic, Hospital for Tumors, UHC Sestre, Croatia.

(3) Usha Rani R, Hill View Institute of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Magdalena Hudcova, Teaching Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Muhammad Bilal, Ain Al Khaleej Hospital, UAE.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kunal Raut, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Snjezana Ramic, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Usha Rani R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determination of Perception and Knowledge of Specimen Rejection Criteria in the Laboratory among Medical Doctors in Southern Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bagiu Iulia Cristina, Assistant Professor, Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Cristianne Confessor Castilho Lopes, University of the Joinville Region, Brazil.

(2) Mandara M S, Kle College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cristianne Confessor Castilho Lopes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mandara M S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Social Media Instagram and Purchasing Decisions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, Professor, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Erhan Buyrukoğlu, İnstitute of Social Sciences, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

(2) Bernardus Franco Maseke, University of Namibia, Namibia.

(3) Santosh Kumar, Himachal Pradesh University Business School, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farooq Rasheed, Air University, Pakistan.

(2) Mohamad Sodikin, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Cendekia Karya Utama, Indonesia.

(3) Ruchi Gautam Pant, India.

(4) S. Lakshmi, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dimpy Sachar, Maharaja Surajmal Institute, India.

(2) P. L.G.S.D. Piumali, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(3) V. Sornaganesh, V.O.Chidambaram College, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Erhan Buyrukoğlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bernardus Franco Maseke, Namibia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Santosh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2