Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Assessment of Phytorid Treatment System Efficacy for Irrigation Water Quality in Bindapur, South-West Delhi, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Atef Mohamed Fathy Mohammed, Environment and Climate Change Research Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Ismail Abdel-Ghaffar Fayed, Zagazig University, Egypt.

(2) Amit Biswas, Haldia Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Ali Widaa Mohammed Elamin, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Ismail Abdel-Ghaffar Fayed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Widaa Mohammed Elamin, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Renewable Energy from Agricultural Waste: Biogas Potential for Sustainable Energy Generation in Nigeria’s Rural Agricultural Communities

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Y.Thiagarajan, HOD-EEE & Placement Advisor, Christ College of  Engineering and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujata Sinha, India.

(2) Md. Mukhlesur Rahman, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(3) Sanjay Roy, Netaji Subhas Open University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujata Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Mukhlesur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjay Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Piriformospora indica Suppresses Natural Incidence and Severity of Black Leaf Mold of Tomato Incited by Pseudocercospora fuligena Over Strobilurin and Triazole Fungicides with Enhanced Growth and Yield

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hailemariam Assefa, Jimma Institute of Technology, Ethiopia.

(2) Jitu Gogoi, Silapathar Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hailemariam Assefa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jitu Gogoi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Neologism and Semantic Shift among Politically Created Terms during Pandemic: A Morpho-Semantic Analysis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Humaira Jamshed, Virtual University of Pakistan, Pakistan.

(2) Angela Rumina A/P Lourdesamy, Management and Science University, Malaysia.

(3) Joemar T. Minoza, Cebu Technological University-Consolacion, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Humaira Jamshed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angela Rumina A/P Lourdesamy, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Joemar T. Minoza, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Sources of Growth of Returns in Paddy Cultivation under Natural Farming v/s Conventional Farming: An Economic Analysis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Pompy Deka, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sajad A. Saraf, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pompy Deka, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajad A. Saraf, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Effect of Demographic Factors on Employee Productivity and Safety Programmmes in Oil and Gas and Construction Industries in the Niger Delta Area, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Isaac Aondofa Agber, Godfrey Okoye University, Nigeria.

(2) Mohamed Nismy Rafiudeen, University Malaya, Malaysia.

(3) Muhammad Aminu Bawa, Baze University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Isaac Aondofa Agber, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed Nismy Rafiudeen, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Aminu Bawa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Public Health Utility of Premarital Screening Tests for ABO / Rhesus Blood Group Incompatibilities and Hepatitis B and C Viral Infections

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alberto Olaya Vargas, Professor, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Aliyu Ibrahim Musaddad, Nasarawa State University Keffi, Nigeria.

(2) Kasara Sripichyakan, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aliyu Ibrahim Musaddad, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kasara Sripichyakan, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Screening of Pearl Millet Hybrids, Parents and their Performance in Hybrids against Blast Disease under Field Conditions

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shankar, Ayurveda Regional Research Institute (CCRAS) Itanagar, India.

(2) Harkesh meena, Ubkv, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rama Shankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harkesh meena, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Bioactivity Guided Isolation of Gallic Acid and Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside from Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Entada africana Guill. & Perr. Stembark Crude Extract

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Prasong Srihanam, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti G. Jain, MAM College of Pharmacy Kalaburagi, India.

(2) Idir Moualek, Mouloud Mammeri of Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria.

(3) Nurul Amira Binti Buslima, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti G. Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Idir Moualek, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nurul Amira Binti Buslima, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA