Peer Review History: Adsorption of Copper and Cadmium from Wastewater Using Chemically Activated Watermelon Peels as Adsorbent

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Akmal S. Gaballa, Professor, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shehu Abdullahi, Federal College of Agricultural Produce Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Noor Ainee Zainol, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cyrille Donlifack Atemkeng, University of Dschang, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shehu Abdullahi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noor Ainee Zainol, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Applied Group-centric Approach for Empowering Banana Farmer’s Agripreneurial Culture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Antonios Avgeris, Hellenic International University, Greece.

(2) Soumya Sakti Dash, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jamee Hellyward, Andalas University, Indonesia.

(2) Shekhar, Sharda University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Antonios Avgeris, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumya Sakti Dash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Multivariate Analysis and Screening of Moth Bean Accessions for Biotic Stresses in the Arid Region of Western India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Reyed M Reyed, Associate Professor, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), City for Scientific Research and Technological Applications “SRTA-CITY” New Burg El-Arab City, Universities and Research Institutes Zone, Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Akmal, Siddharth University, India.

(2) Arash Vaghef Koodehi, Kashan University, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Waqar Mazhar, GC University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Akmal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arash Vaghef Koodehi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes bla SHV, bla TOHO and bla NDM in Pathogenic Gram-Negative Bacilli at the Pietro Annigoni Biomolecular Research Center

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Assistant Professor, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Patrick Martin, Université d’Artois, France.

(2) Muhammad Akram, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

(3) Gilcimara Da Silva Tavares, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Patrick Martin, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Akram, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gilcimara Da Silva Tavares, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Essentiality of Micronutrients in Soil: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dodo Juliet Dingtsen, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Yaroslava Hryhoriv, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Petra Chui, Egerton University Kenya, Cameroon.

(2) S. Murali, Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dodo Juliet Dingtsen, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yaroslava Hryhoriv, Ukraine) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Future of Plant Breeding: Advancements and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kamal Kant, Associate Professor, Aspee Shakilam Biotechnology Institute, Navsari Agricultural University, Surat, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manigopa Chakraborty, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, School of Undergraduate, College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Richard Mankin, US.

(2) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manigopa Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Current Status of Poultry Coccidiosis in Developing India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eugene A. Silow, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Institute of water Modelling, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Guta Wakjira Adino, National Veterinary Institute, Ethiopia.

(2) Chikwanda Chileshe, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guta Wakjira Adino, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chikwanda Chileshe, Zambia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | 6.Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Seed Priming on Fodder Yield of Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) A. M. Misal, VNMKV, India.

(2) Praveen Kumar, Agriculture University of Jodhpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Okram Ricky Devi, Assam Agricultural University, India

(2) Trisha Sinha, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. M. Misal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Praveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Variability, Heritability, and Genetic Advance in Paddy (Oryza sativa L.) with Special Reference to Satna, Madhya Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rigoberto Fimia Duarte, University of Medical Sciences of Villa Clara, Cuba.

(2) Cardei Petru, The National Institute of Research Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Taghreed El Sayed Eissa, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rigoberto Fimia Duarte, Cuba) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cardei Petru, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Nutrient Sources on Soil Properties and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Organic Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Roghan H B, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Kha Lil Dinh, Center for Vocational Education, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roghan H B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kha Lil Dinh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA