Peer Review History: Market Efficiency and Price Spread in Jaipur District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ojedokun, A. Olajide, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

(2) Muhammad Sarmad Mushtaq, Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ojedokun, A. Olajide, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Sarmad Mushtaq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Guide to People Management Practices Focused on the Circular Economy: A Theoretical Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luca Grilli, Associate Professor, University of Foggia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mary Ana Seline Angoluan, Trinity University of Asia, Philippines.

(2) Yemane Gebremeskel Gebrehiwet, Ethiopian Civil Service Universit, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haddou Zamani, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(2) Punamkumar Hinge, IIEBM Indus Business School, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Saipul Wakit, Muhammadiyah University of Jember, Indonesian.

(2) Sapna, Maharshi Dayanand University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mary Ana Seline Angoluan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yemane Gebremeskel Gebrehiwet, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Formative Assessment Practices in Social Studies Instructions: A Case Study of Holy Child College of Education in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Saipul Wakit, Muhammadiyah University of Jember, Indonesia.

(2) Miftahurrizki Habiburrahman, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Monika Thakwani, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, India.

(2) SK Chand Basha, KL (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saipul Wakit, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miftahurrizki Habiburrahman, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Evaluation of Fungicides and Botanicals against Uromyces ciceris arietini Inciting Chickpea Rust Disease

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aldrin Yanong Cantila, The University of Western Australia, Australia.

(2) Junaid Ahmed, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aldrin Yanong Cantila, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Junaid Ahmed, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impacts of Long-term Application of Fertilizer and Manures on Physico-chemical Properties, Phosphorus Uptake and Crop Yield at Different Growth Stages of Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Antoine Karangwa, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.

(2) Lennin Musundire, CIMMYT, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Antoine Karangwa, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lennin Musundire, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Constraints in Poultry Farming in Reasi District of Jammu and Kashmir, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Professor, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Karrar Imad Abdulsahib Al-Shammari, Al-Musaib Technical College, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Kavitha, G., IAH & VB, KVAFSU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ihsan Ur Rahman, Hazara University Mansehra Kpk, Pakistan.

(2) Arogbodo, J. O., Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.

(3) Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Karrar Imad Abdulsahib Al-Shammari, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kavitha, G., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Speed Breeding: One of the Rapid Generation Advancement Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhavna, Bihar Veterinary College, Bihar animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Sana Farhadi, University of Tabriz, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dibyajyoti Talukdar, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India.

(2) Eragam Aparna, ANGRAU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhavna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sana Farhadi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Performance Analysis of Stainless-Steel Tube and Glass Coated Copper Tube Receiver in Parabolic Trough Collectors for Enhanced Thermal Efficiency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Professor, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Eyosiyas Yohannis, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Sathish Kumar Palaniappan, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eyosiyas Yohannis, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sathish Kumar Palaniappan, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation of Aqueous Drinks Using Tigernut and Moringa Seeds: Effect of Adding Chemical Hurdles and Fortificants on Physico-Chemical and Rheological Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, Assistant Professor, Dean, School of Science and Technology, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) V Venkata Basava Rao, Osmania University, India.

(2) Tambo Tene Stephano, University of Dschang, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Subburaj M, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V Venkata Basava Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tambo Tene Stephano, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in F2 Segregating Population of Cross RNR-15048 x Dokra-Dokri in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Aarju Sharma, ICAR- Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, India.

(2) Virupakshi Hiremata, ICAR- Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India.

(3) Abass Adebayo Olalekan, Lagos State University of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aarju Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Virupakshi Hiremata, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abass Adebayo Olalekan, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA