Peer Review History: An Overview on (LDHs)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Balaganesh, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

(2) Cristina Mosoarca, National Institute of Research and Development for Electrochemistry and Condensed Matter, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) El Amrani Belkacem, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Balaganesh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cristina Mosoarca, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield Gap Analysis of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) through Cluster Front Line Demonstration under NFSM Pulses Scheme in Khowai District, Tripura, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kholil, Sahid University, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rachel J. Sarol, Philippines.

(2) A. J. M. Sirajul Karim, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maqsood Ali Wagan, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rachel J. Sarol, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A.J.M. Sirajul Karim, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physiological and Physical Responses of Heat Stress: A Study on Women Farm Workers during Wheat Harvesting

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Subrata Kumar Mandal, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, India.

(2) Agumas Fentahun Ayalew, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Ethiopia, College of Medicine, Shandong University, China.

(3) Salih Kadhim Alwan Alsharifi, Al Qassim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim-Olesin, Sikiru, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu-Alike, Nigeria.

(2) Linus Nghilifavali Hafeni, Olulongo Combined School, Namibia.

(3) Metages Yirgalem Tindashe, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subrata Kumar Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agumas Fentahun Ayalew, Ethiopia, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Salih Kadhim Alwan Alsharifi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Heterosis for Yield and its Component Traits in Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aliyu Uba Ahmed, Federal College of Agricultural Produce Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Surender Kumar Verma, Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kolimigundla Amarnath, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) S. Sasipriya, Mallareddy University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aliyu Uba Ahmed, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Surender Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Physiological Performances and Germination Accompanying Enzymes of Seed Considering Some Lentil Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) V. N. Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

(2) T. Leon Stephan Raj, St. Xavier’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahad Abd Ali Hadi Matloob, Al-Mussaib Technical College, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. N. Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. Leon Stephan Raj, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Characterization of Underutilized Legume Sword Bean (Canavalia gladiata Jacq.) Genotypes of North-Eastern Hill Region of India Under Foot Hill of Arunachal Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hakan Ulukan, Türkiye.

(2) Savita Rani, Baddi University of Emerging Science &Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hakan Ulukan, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Savita Rani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst Ex. A Rich Harms) Using Morphological Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Prathyusha Engineering College, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ufuoma Bigila Shemishere, Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Chinelo A. Ezeabara, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Girish Charandas Kamble, SRRL Science College Morshi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ufuoma Bigila Shemishere, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinelo A. Ezeabara, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fabrication of Customized Ocular Prosthesis using a Surface Sealant and Modified Laboratory Technique Using Stainless Steel Wire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Arshad F. Jassem Al-Kaabi, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Mariska Juanita, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arshad F. Jassem Al-Kaabi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mariska Juanita, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Clinical Management of Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Integrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Yong X. Gan, Professor, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhagyashree Kar, Jharkhand Raksha Shakti University, India.

(2) Saba Abdulzahra Obaid AL Shiaa, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, University of Bahri, Sudan.

(2) Alberto Marangoni, Catholic University of Córdoba, Argentina.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhagyashree Kar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saba Abdulzahra Obaid AL Shiaa, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Undergraduate Medical Students’ Preferred Choices of Learning Style, Teaching Pedagogies and Assessment methods in the Ophthalmology Module at National Defence University of Malaysia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nasim Ilyas, Bahawalpur Medical College, Pakistan.

(2) Yunia Hastami, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rupa Sharma, RNT Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nasim Ilyas, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yunia Hastami, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA