Peer Review History: Exploring the Sequence of Science Contents in the Intended Primary Curriculum of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Asong Joseph, International University of Malaya, Malaysia.

(2) Wong Shiat Lu, Institute of Teaching Education, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) David C. Coker, Fort Hays State University, USA.

(2) Jacob Aaworb-Nang Maabobr Kor, Catholic University Of Ghana, Ghana.

(3) Vasileios Zagkotas, University of Ioannina, Greece.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Aungkana Boonsem, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand.

(2) Oluremi Noah Oyarinde, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asong Joseph, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wong Shiat Lu, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Trap Cropping of Brassica juncea (Linn.) on the Management of Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on B. oleracea var. capitata (Linn.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj S Paul, Dr. B. R Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Alireza Amiri-Jami, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Mohammadipour, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manoj S Paul, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Alireza Amiri-Jami, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Panicle Architecture in Enhancing Grain Yield in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tuğba Hasibe Uysal, Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, Turkey.

(2) Salar Monajjem, University of Guilan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suraj Shrestha, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tekalign Afeta Beyene, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tuğba Hasibe Uysal, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Salar Monajjem, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Multidimensional Scope, Current Status, Uses and Contribution of Green Gold Bamboo: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravikantha Prabhu, St Joseph Engineering College, India.

(2) Muhammad Obie, State Islamic University of Sultan Amai, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sérgio Murilo Petri, Universidade De Federal De Santa Catarina, Brazil.

(2) Shadrack Kwaku Debrah, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Ghana.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ravikantha Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muhammad Obie, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Micronutrients and Biofertilizer Treatments on Yield and it`s Attributes of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) cv. RCR-41

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tahir Saleem, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, India.

(2) Mohamed Taha Zalama, Field Crops Research Institute, A. R. C., Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arinta Rury Puspitasari, Indonesian Sugar Research Institute, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nur Kholida Wulansari, Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tahir Saleem, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohamed Taha Zalama, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Future of Rice Farming: A Review of Natural and Eco-Friendly Practices

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bir Jahangir Shirazy, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Akhouri Sanjay Kumar Sinha, SLIET Longowal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bir Jahangir Shirazy, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Akhouri Sanjay Kumar Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economics of Cabbage Production Under Different Levels of Integrated Nutrient Management in Varanasi Region of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. R. Padma, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Otaiza Cupare, Centro de Estudios Regionales, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. R. Padma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Otaiza Cupare, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Assessment of Five Common Types of Green Tea in Benghazi Markets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Worapan Sitthithawornm, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.

(2) Edson Kemoi, University of Kabianga, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Judit Tarek-Tilistyak, University of Nyíregyháza, Hungary.

(2) Meena Anand K, Manipal University College Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Raj Singh, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) B.B. Borse, CSIR-CFTRI, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Worapan Sitthithaworn, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Edson Kemoi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Natural Regeneration Potential of Senegalia senegal by Rejection in Chad: Implications for Sustainable Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunying Li, Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ponugoti Mounica, Hindu College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Hanaa  A. Abokoura, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamal Prasad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Beadaa Abdalqader Mahdii, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ponugoti Mounica, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hanaa A. Abokoura, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemically Treated Chicken Feather Meal for Fish Feed

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Assistant Professor, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

(2) Prof. B. Deivasigamani, Annamalai University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Umamaheswari, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(2) Paari KA, CHRIST University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Umamaheswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Paari KA, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA