Peer Review History: Preliminary Inventory of Stomoxys spp., Potential Vectors of Pathogens in the Minkébé Forest Massif in the North-East of Gabon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘GR.T.POPA’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Carlos Ramón Bautista Garfias, INIFAP, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Yakubu Mary Arichca, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Carlos Ramón Bautista Garfias, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reflection on Implementing Geometric Intuition in the Junior High School Mathematics Classroom

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Míriam Hernández Del Barco, University of Extremadura, Spain.

(2) Hamidu Ibrahim Bukari, Bagabaga College of Education, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sri Imelda Edo, Indonesia.

(2) S. S.Venkata Subramanian, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Vali Soltani Masih, Payame Noor University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ega Gradini, IAIN Takengon, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Míriam Hernández Del Barco, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hamidu Ibrahim Bukari, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Quality of Banking Services Perceived by Rural Customers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Diana Widhi Rachmawati, PGRI University, Indonesia.

(2) Pratap Chandra Mandal, Indian Institute of Management, India.

(3) Feliks Anggia Binsar Kristian Panjaitan, Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asiamah Yeboah, Kumasi Technical University, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rajeev Kumar, NIFT, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Diana Widhi Rachmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pratap Chandra Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Feliks Anggia Binsar Kristian Panjaitan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD), Diagnosis, and Current Medication-Based Management Options: Schematic Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Purushothaman Padmanabhan, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital, India.

(2) Venugopal H G, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nicola Basso, Un.of Rome-Sapienza, Italy.

(2) Orlando Téllez Almenares, University of Medical Sciences of Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Purushothaman Padmanabhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Venugopal H G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment Studies on Different Feed Formulation Methods with Novel Aquafeed Software in African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822) Farming in Earthen Ponds

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Assistant Professor, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) H. K. S. de Zoysa, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) Yudha Trinoegraha Adiputra, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(3) Bhukya Bhaskar, RGCA, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (H. K. S. de Zoysa, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yudha Trinoegraha Adiputra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Bhukya Bhaskar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield, Uptake and Soil Properties of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) in Alluvial Soil of Gird Region of Madhya Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Renisson Neponuceno de Araujo Filho, Federal University of Tocantins, Brazil.

(2) Nur Qursyna Boll Kassim, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Renisson Neponuceno de Araujo Filho, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nur Qursyna Boll Kassim, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Physico-chemical Characters of Different Genotypes of Karonda (Carissa carandas L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Pramod Verma, Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(2) Swapnil Pandey, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pramod Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Swapnil Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Craniofacial Angular Photogrammetric Evaluation of Ijaws Resident in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Basser Ali Abdullah, University of Mosul, College of Dentistry, Iraq.

(2) Tahrir N. Aldelaimi, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjeev V Jakati, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

(2) Stephen A. Fadare, Mindanao State University (Main), Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Luigi Giovanni Bernardo Sichi, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Basser Ali Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tahrir N. Aldelaimi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unraveling the Genetic Framework Underlying Yield Dynamics in Maize (Zea mays L.): A Genetic Variability Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Punika Chaisemsaeng, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(2) Yunus Arifien, Nusa Bangsa University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akinrinade A. Olunloyo, Federal College of Forestry, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Punika Chaisemsaeng, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yunus Arifien, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review Study on Performance Improvement of Coal Gangue as Coarse Aggregate in Concrete

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Professor, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Ranjith, Narayana Engineering College, India.

(2) Anand Babu Kotta, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Derya Oz Aksoy, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey.

(2) Eliyas Abdulkerim, Madda Walabu University, Ethiopia.

(3) Jaswant Nagraj Kandikanti, MGMU, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, India.

(4) Pranita Banerjee, Middle East College, Oman.

(5) A. A. Abd Noor, Al Muthanna University, Iraq.

(6) Derek Mostert, The University of Pretoria, South Africa.

(7) Naveen G M, Government Engineering College, India.

(8) Tejas D. Doshi, KLE Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amanpreet Tangri, Chandigarh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (R. Ranjith, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anand Babu Kotta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA