Peer Review History: Effect of Medium Type of Varieties and Organic Sources of Nutrients on Growth, Yield and Economics of Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer kabulium L.) under Bundelkhand Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Chandra Deb, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

(2) Wafa Terouzi, Hight School of Technology, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anil Chandra Deb, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wafa Terouzi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Role of Bio- Regulators in the Growth and Development of Fruit and Vegetable Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Preeya P. Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(2) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Preeya P. Wangsomnuk, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Yield Potential of Paddy Variety CR 1009 Sub 1 to Impart Resilience to Farmers in NICRA Village, Thiruvarur District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Frank Mudenda, University of Zambia, Zambia.

(2) Mehrtash Eskandaripour, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hung, VNU, Viet Nam.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Frank Mudenda, Zambia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mehrtash Eskandaripour, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Concentrations of Auxin Hormone (IBA) Upon Promoting Root Development of Stem Cuttings in the ‘Scented Geranium’, Pelargonium graveolens L

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Beguinot, University of Burgundy, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) Majid Abdulhameed Ibrahim, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mahrous Abd El-Baset Attia, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) M. R. Suchitra, Sastra Deemed University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Majid Abdulhameed Ibrahim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Variability, Correlation Coefficient and Path Analysis in Improved Restorer Lines of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Clement Gyeabour Kyere, Seventh-day Adventist College of Education, Ghana.

(2) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Clement Gyeabour Kyere, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Detection of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern and Molecular Detection of Resistance Genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Urine Samples of Suspected UTI Patients Attending Public Hospitals in Nasarawa South Senatorial District, Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Suvarna Sande, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, India.

(2) Judith Rukweza, Fatima College of Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Egbunu Zacharia Kadiayeno, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Nigeria.

(2) Syeda Fatima Manzelat, UK.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suvarna Sande, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Judith Rukweza, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mesenteric Cyst as Inguinal Hernia, Should We Do More?

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Associate Professor, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA and Professor, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Surendra Ugale, Kirloskar Hospital, India.

(2) Wessam Monther Mohammed Saleh, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Surendra Ugale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wessam Monther Mohammed Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Practice of Basic Life Support among Health Workers in the Upper Denkyira East Municipality of Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Diana Cecilia Tapia-Pancardo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tlalnepantla, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ritika Rocque, College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Afaf Mahmoud Attia Hassan, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(3) Lucia Tobase, Centro Universitário São Camilo, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayman Alamri, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ritika Rocque, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Afaf Mahmoud Attia Hassan, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Lucia Tobase, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Life Span Changes of Coffee White Stem Borers, Xylotrechus quadripes (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Response to Directed Homosexual and Heterosexual Interactions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tekou Ngunte Hervé, Institut of fisheries an Aquatic Sciences of the University of Douala, Cameroon.

(2) Havva Kübra Soydabaş Ayoub, Kocaeli University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tekou Ngunte Hervé, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Havva Kübra Soydabaş Ayoub, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Long Term Integrated Plant Nutrient System (IPNS) in Rice –Wheat Cropping System on Population Dynamics and Dominance of Weed Species in Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Nalini, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) C. Vedhi, V. O Chidambaram College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Almeida, F. M, UFRO, Brasil.

(2) Y. S. Paramewari, PJTSAU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. Nalini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (C. Vedhi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA