Peer Review History: Traditional Seed Production and Processing Method for Urochloa Grass Employed by Farmers in the Adamawa Region of Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali University, Rajasthan, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Barbara Wieliczko, Institute for Rural and Agricultural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.

(2) P. Rajesh, Annamalai University, Government Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Adewole Olukorede, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Barbara Wieliczko, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P. Rajesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Three Varieties and Application Methods of Muriate of Potash Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Onion

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia.

(2) Luiz Carlos Ferreira, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of the Northern Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luiz Carlos Ferreira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Restoration of Chemo-Surveillance as a Top Priority to Save Cancer Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lomas Kumar Tomar, Galway University Hospital, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

(2) Dr. Guy-Armel Bounda, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Marcela N. Garcia, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.

(2) Ikhwan Rinaldi, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

(3) R. Vidhyalakshmi, Dr. Mgr Janaki College or Arts& Science for Women, India.

(4) S. Vijaya Nirmala, Sri Ramachandra Institutue of Higher Education and Research, India.

(5) Xiaojing Chang, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China.

(6) Enrique Wulff, ICMAN-CSIC, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aleksey N Shoutko, Russian Research Center for Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Russia.

(2) Amany A. Ghazy Elshenawy, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt.

(3) Hany Samy Attallah, International Medical Centre Egypt, Egypt.

(4) Poornima BN, CMR University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pierre Jean Aurelus, UNAM, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.91/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marcela N. Garcia, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ikhwan Rinaldi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (R. Vidhyalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (S. Vijaya Nirmala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Xiaojing Chang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_6 (Enrique Wulff, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Bulking Agents on Physical, Chemical and Biological Properties of Latex Sludge Waste

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

(2) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Gregorius Prima Indra Budianto, University of Setia Budi, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Keshava Joshi, SDMCET, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Aziz Benhamrouche, Ferhat Abbas University Setif1, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Udokang Anietie Edem, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gregorius Prima Indra Budianto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tillage and Crop Residue Management on Weed Dynamics and Productivity of Direct Seeded Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Trisha Sinha, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

(2) Anthoula Gleridou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Trisha Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anthoula Gleridou, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Foliar Feeding of NAA, Urea, Nano-urea and Biofertisol on Fruit Quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Barlin Orlando Olivares, University of Cordoba, Spain.

(2) T. Leon Stephan Raj, St. Xavier’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt.

(2) Olha Shapoval, Kharkiv National Medical University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Barlin Orlando Olivares, Spain) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (T. Leon Stephan Raj, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc and Boron on Growth Attributes and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Farooq Ahmad Khan, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.

(2) Hamideh Ghaffari, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Yaseen, GLA University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Farooq Ahmad Khan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hamideh Ghaffari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Resource Use and Economic Potential of Chickpea Cultivation in Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nandipamu Tony Manoj Kumar, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Musagaliev Ajiniyaz Jumagulovich, Karakalpak State University, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anurag Hazarika, Tezpur Central University, India.

(2) Chang-sheng Liao, Hubei Polytechnic University, China.

(3) Musagaliev Ajiniyaz Jumagulovich, Karakalpak State University, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nandipamu Tony Manoj Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Musagaliev Ajiniyaz Jumagulovich, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marketing Status of Various Insecticide Brand and Buying Behaviour of Onion Growers in Amreli District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sule Isin, Professor, Ege University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rolando Mamani Quispe, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Bolivia.

(2) Shuchi Tiwari, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rolando Mamani Quispe, Bolivia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shuchi Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Approximation of One Step Block Approach for Simulation of Second Order Oscillatory Differential Equations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leandro A. Pasa, Professor, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Magdy Rabie Soliman Sanad, Professor, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Iman Malmir, MUT University of Technology, Iran.

(2) Bharti V Nathwani, Amity School of Applied Sciences, Amity University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avadis Simon Hacinliyan, Yeditepe University, Turkey.

(2) Firas Adel Fawzi, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(3) Mohammed Bsiss, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Iman Malmir, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bharti V Nathwani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA