Peer Review History: Comprehension of the Application of Mckinsey’s 7s Model by Women in SMEs in Ghana; the Mediating Role of Commitment

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Komenan Yao Cebastien, Université Alassane Ouattara, Côte d’ Ivoire.

(2) Uchechi Chinazom Ekejiuba, Nile University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Achmad Zawawi, Indonesia.

(2) Adina Titei, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania.

(3) Guido Berens, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Netherlands.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Komenan Yao Cebastien, Côte d’ Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Uchechi Chinazom Ekejiuba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics of Major Insect Pests Associated with Karanja (Pongomia pinnata L.) Pierre Based Agroforestry System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Geetha, Sugar Research Institute of Fiji, Fiji.

(2) Daniela Stoin, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I”, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniela Roberta Holdefer, UNiversidade Estadual do Paraná- UNESPAR, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (N. Geetha, Fiji) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Daniela Stoin, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Constraints in Consumption of Organic Products and Green Marketing in Varanasi District of Uttar Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chanate Ratanaubol, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(2) Onwubiko Emmanuel Chidiadi, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Chanate Ratanaubol, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Onwubiko Emmanuel Chidiadi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of ICT in Effective Dissemination of Extension Information among Women Livestock Farmers in North West Region of Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Jajnaseni Rout, Ravenshaw University, India.

(2) Juvy G. Mojares, College of Engineering, Batangas State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay Nandal, Maharshi Dayanand University  Rohtak, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jajnaseni Rout, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Juvy G. Mojares, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Idiopathic Pulmonary Hemosiderosis in Pediatric in Patients: Report of Four Cases in Rabat, Morrocco

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Diana Cecilia Tapia-Pancardo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tlalnepantla, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Srihari S. Kumar Raju, Maharajah’s Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) A. Anand Kumar, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (D. Srihari S. Kumar Raju, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A. Anand Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Modeling of Enoyl Acyl Carrier Protein Reductase Inhibitors for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their Pharmacokinetic Predictions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Micheal Vincent Abiodun, The Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Galih Satrio Putra, State University of Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Xu-Guang Guo, Guangzhou Medical University, Republic of China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Galih Satrio Putra, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge Level of Farmers towards Use of Private Bio-fertilizers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) J. B. Kathiriya, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Maryam Afrousheh, Pistachio Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran.

(3) S. Kerketta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (J. B. Kathiriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maryam Afrousheh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (S. Kerketta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Productivity of Dry Grains of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] Creole Cultivar (Canupum), as a Function of Different Planting Densities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tatiana Eugenia Sesan, Professor, University of Bucharest, Romania and National Research-Development Institute for Chemistry and Petrochemistry, Bucharest, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Yashwant Singh, Government College, India.

(2) Subrata Mandal, Rathindra Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Institute of Agriculture, Visva-Bharati University, India.

(3) Erny Ishartati, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhia Ahmed Taain, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nedjah  Nawel, National Higher School of Technology and Engineering, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yashwant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Subrata Mandal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Erny Ishartati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Natural Enemies Role in Cost Reduction: An Analysis of Rice Cultivation in Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Amir Abdolmaleki, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Jerusa Souza Andrade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Universidade Nilton Lins, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ahmed Awad Talb, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amir Abdolmaleki, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jerusa Souza Andrade, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soybean Bacterial Endophytes against Anthracnose Disease Collected from Karnataka State: An in-vitro Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gayatriben Bhagavandas Patel, SMMPISR, Kadi Sarva Vishwa Vidhyalaya, India.

(2) Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gayatriben Bhagavandas Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA