Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Approach to Manage Eriophyes prosopidis Mite induced Flower Galls in Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Lakshman Chandra Patel, College of Agriculture, BCKV, India.

(2) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdulnabi Abulameer Matrood, Basrah University, Iraq.

(2) Andrea Verónica De Fátima Oviedo, Universidad Nacional De Tucumán, Argentina.

(3) Chouikhi Sabrine, Arid Lands Institute, Tunisia.

(4) Saeedeh Javar, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

(5) Samah Metwally Mahmoud Abd El-Aziz, The National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Juan Esteban Barranco Florido, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lakshman Chandra Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Sowing Time and Cultivars on Oil Content, Yield Attributes and Yield of Safflower

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) B.B. Nayak, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Olifir Yurii, Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Latrech Basma, INRGREF, Tunisia.

(2) Pankaj Kumar Ray, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

(2) Nedjah Nawel, National Higher School of Technology and Engineering –  Annaba, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (B. B. Nayak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Olifir Yurii, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance for Morphological Traits in Different Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Manfred Bondzie Ewool, Ghana.

(2) Raeed M. Abdullah, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Delvadiya Indrajay, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manfred Bondzie Ewool, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Raeed M. Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Analysis of Quantitative Traits, Gall Midge and Brown Spot Tolerance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes under Irrigated Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ntambo Mbuya, University of Lubumbashi, Congo.

(2) Punika Chaisemsaeng, Kalasin University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anselmo Enrique Ferrer Hernandez, Havana University-Cuba, Cuba.

(2) Mahmoud Abbas Ali, South Valley University, Egypt.

(3) Mingzeng Sun, USA.

(4) Tran Van Minh, International University, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Samah Metwally Mahmoud Abd El-Aziz, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ntambo Mbuya, Congo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Punika Chaisemsaeng, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Correlation between the Seasonal Incidence of Aphids and Coccinellids on the Indian Mustard in Different Varieties and Sowing Dates

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Hawraa Yahya Mohammed, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Ardilles Juan Carlos Alves dos Santos, Federal University of Piauí, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adolfo Arturo Del Rio Mora, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Mexico.

(2) Archana Anokhe, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(3) KS Behera, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Laribi Habchi Hassiba, University Blida 1, Algeria.

(2) Wenzhu Guan, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Iraq Hawraa Yahya, Mohammed ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ardilles Juan Carlos Alves dos Santos, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Ectoparasites and Endoparasites in Snakehead Fish (Channa striata) and Climbing Perch Fish (Anabas testudineus) Caught in the Sebangau River of Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Assistant Professor, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Taghi Ahady, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Rafid A Abdulkareem, Baghdad University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Essoh Ayimba, Université de Lomé, Togo.

(2) Truță Alina Mihaela, The National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Pitești University Center, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammad Taghi Ahady, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rafid A Abdulkareem, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Long-Term Visual Outcome of Paediatric Cataract Surgery at Kitwe Teaching Eye Hospital, Kitwe, Zambia

Editor(s):

(1) Tatsuya Mimura, Associate Professor, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ivelina Pitakova, Bulgaria.

(2) Yousef Farhaoui, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco.

(3) Tayo Julius Bogunjoko, Eye Foundation Hospital, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali H. Al-Hamdani, Gilgamesh Ahliya University, Iraq.

(2) Roger Alonso Royo, Centro San Isidoro, Spain.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A. Tamil Selvan, Kmct College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ivelina Pitakova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yousef Farhaoui, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Tayo Julius Bogunjoko, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genotoxic and Cytotoxicity Activities of Leaf Extract of Setaria megaphylla

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ameen Hadi Mohammed, College of Science of Women, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) V. N. Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

(3) Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Assumpta Ugenyi, University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Nigeria.

(2) A. Vijaya Anand, Bharathiar University, India.

(3) Daniela Stoin, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I” , Romania.

(4) Henry Ogbonna, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

(5) Madhu Toshniwal, Govt. Women Engineering College, India.

(6) Nehia Neama Hussein, University of Technology, Iraq.

(7) Salwa Razzaq Abdul Ameer, Iraq.

(8) Vibhor Kumar Jain, JK Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sonam Bhutia, Government Pharmacy College Sajong, Sikkim University, India.

(2) Uday Raj Sharma, Acharya & BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ameen Hadi Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (V. N. Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Awareness of Radiation Hazards and Safety among Dental Hygienists, Dental Assistants and Dental Assistant Interns in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Sakthi  Devi, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, India.

(2) R. Pradeep Kumar, SIMATS, Saveetha University, India.

(3) Assaoui Fatna, Higher Institute of Health Professions and Technologies, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Sakthi Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R. Pradeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Assaoui Fatna, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Overview of Computer Operating Systems and Emerging Trends

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. G. Sudheer, Professor, GVP College of Engineering for Women, Madhurawada, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arjun Reddy Kunduru, USA.

(2) Aditya Bhardwaj, NITTTR, India.

(3) T S Arulananth, JNTUH, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. P. Mangani, Dr. N. G. P Arts and Science College, India.

(2) M. Mohankumar, India.

(3) Muhammed Mizher Radhi, Middle Technical University (MTU), Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Arjun Reddy Kunduru, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aditya Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (T S Arulananth, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA