Peer Review History: Examining Modern Strategies for Effective and Sustainable Agricultural Plant Protection Techniques: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Associate Professor, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdel Kader El Hajj, The Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute, Lebanon.

(2) Ajay Kumar Srivastava, St Xavier’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdel Kader El Hajj, Lebanon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ajay Kumar Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Level of Satisfaction among Farmers Towards University’s Kisan Mela

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Semuel Leunufna, Associate Professor, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia.

(2) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

(3) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) M. D Magoro, Tompi Seleka College of Agriculture, South Africa.

(2) Chiam CC, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

(2) K S Thakur, Govind Guru Tribal University, India.

(3) Praveen B Binjha, Ravenshaw University, India.

(4) Shyamasundar Tripathy, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (Deemed to Be University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mu Mu Han, Myanmar Maritime University, Myanmar.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M.D Magoro, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chiam CC, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Expected Values of Buys-Ballot Estimates for Multiplicative Model with the Error Terms

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shi-Hai Dong, School of Physics and Mathematics, National Polytechnic Institute, Building 9, Unit Professional Adolfo Lopez Mateos, A. P. 07738, Mexico D. F., Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Dodzi Kutor Havi, Methodist University, Ghana.

(2) Mojtaba Sedighi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Shatrajit Goswami, Institute of Advanced Education and Research, India.

(4) Slim Chtioui, FSEG SFAX, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anak Agung Gde Satia Utama, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.

(2) Jyoti Badge, VIT University Bhopal, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Emmanuel Dodzi Kutor Havi, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mojtaba Sedighi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shatrajit Goswami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Slim Chtioui, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Ultrasound Guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block or Modified Pectoral Fascial Plane Block on the Postoperative Analgesia after Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Assistance Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amarjyoti Hazarika, PGIMER, India.

(2) Krishna Prasad.T, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College And Research Institue, Shri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, India.

(3) Siddique Ahmad, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Carolina Giordano, Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital, Italy.

(2) Irene Scagnol, Italy.

(3) Rupinder Kaur Kaiche, MVP Medical College,MUHS, India.

(4) Sakshi Arora, Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, India.

(5) Surendra Kumar Sethi, R. N. T. Medical College, India.

(6) Susan T Cheeran, Government Medical College Kottayam, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) G B Sumalatha, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amarjyoti Hazarika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Krishna Prasad.T, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Siddique Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Application of Water-Soluble Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Sadhukhan, Testing Centre & Vocational Training Centre, College of Horticulture, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) M.Massub Tehseen, North Dakota State University, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rahul Sadhukhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. Massub Tehseen, United States of America) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Associated Cross Resistance Patterns in South Indian Crop Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Beguinot, University of Burgundy, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Girija P, S D College, India.

(2) Aba-Toumnou Lucie, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Beatriz Xoconostle-Cázares, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Girija P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aba-Toumnou Lucie, Central African Republic) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Report on Environmental Sustainability: A Global Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Ifeanyi Onwuka, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(2) Isaac Sarfo, College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adi Tonggiroh, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

(2) Alice LI Miu Ling, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, China.

(3) Chadetrik Rout, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

(4) Dhani Setyawan, Indonesia.

(5) Gideon Samba, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

(6) Hossein Habibi, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Edda Brenda S. Yerro, University of San Agustin, Philippines.

(2) Najamussahar H Mulla, JSS Science and Technology University, India.

(3) Prency Yerro, West Visayas State University, Philppines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ifeanyi Onwuka, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Isaac Sarfo, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Options of OSMF along with Future Developments

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashvin . Wagh, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) K. Yamini, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepa V, Kodagu Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Qusay kh. Al-Dulamey, Mosul University, Iraq.

(3) Snehasis Bhunia, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ashvin . Wagh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. Yamini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Flood Tolerance of Hybrid Napier (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum glaucum) Cultivars

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

(2) Maria José Silva, ISA, ULisboa, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Murugaragavan Ramasamy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ronald Kityo, Ndejje University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria José Silva, Portugal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on the Available Nutrient-Supplying Capacity of Soil in Degradation Vulnerable Soils of Central Dry Zone in Tumkur District, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruchuon Wanna, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(2) Hind Bushra Ahmed, Ahfad University for Women, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afam-Ezeaku Chikaodili Eziamaka, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Titiya Netwong, Suan Dusit University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ruchuon Wanna, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hind Bushra Ahmed, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA