Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Supta Sarkar, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Carmine Finelli, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Supta Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Carmine Finelli, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Usmangani Tabani, Christ College, India.

(2) Samreen Farha, Ajmal Khan Tibbiya College, India.

(3) Sumit Munjal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usmangani Tabani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samreen Farha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sumit Munjal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wafaa Haggag, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalit Yadav, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalit Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalit Upadhyay, Sher E Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

(2) Shyam Praveen Rajendran, Little Flower International School, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalit Upadhyay, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shyam Praveen Rajendran, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhir Kumar Jena, Rajiv Gandhi University, India.

(2) Oyediran Wasiu, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(3) Darlington Arnold Mangaba, Rusangu University, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhir Kumar Jena, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oyediran Wasiu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Darlington Arnold Mangaba, Zambia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Katayoun Haryalchi, Associate Professor, Guilan University of Medical Science, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Rasmita Kumari Samantaray, Odisha University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Milan Miljkovic, University of Nis, Serbia.

(3) Mona H Mandour, Alazhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rasmita Kumari Samantaray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Milan Miljkovic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mona H Mandour, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Magdy Youssef Mahmoud El-Kholy, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Amlan Bishal, Bharat Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Magdy Youssef Mahmoud El-Kholy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amlan Bishal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Esiosa Adewale, University of Louisville, USA.

(2) Utkarsh Ghate, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Esiosa Adewale, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Utkarsh Ghate, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Edwin Benigno, New Era University, Philippines.

(2) Kaneriya Kushkumar M, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Edwin Benigno, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kaneriya Kushkumar M, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernandez, Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikhil Reddy K S, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, India

(2) D. Sheema, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikhil Reddy K S, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Sheema, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA