Peer Review History: Pulse Productivity and Profitability as Influenced by Cluster Frontline Demonstrations in Kupwara District of Jammu and Kashmir, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Małgorzata Skwierawska, University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland.

(2) Barikara Umesh, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) V Vijaya Lakshmi, Prof Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ankur Kumar Tanwar, University of Delhi, India.

(3) Anthoula Gleridou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(4) Hamdy M. Abdel-Rahman, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(5) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(6) Lovelyn Bihnchang Epouse Ngwa, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, USA.

(7) Nik Nur Shaadah Nik Dzulkefli, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

(8) Nweze Basil Obasi, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria.

(9) Nyimas Popi Indriani, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.

(10) Praveen Kumar Chachaiya, Agriculture University, India.

(11) Prerna Baraily, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidhyalaya, India.

(12) Shweta B Kukreti, Kerala Forest Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nejjar El Ansari Zineb, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Małgorzata Skwierawska, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Barikara Umesh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Validating the Psychometric Properties of Mental Health Literacy Scale among Filipino College Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vlasta Hus, Associate Professor, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(2) V. Christopher Amalraj, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Nasir Ismail, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(2) Ratchaneekorn Upasen, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (V. Christopher Amalraj, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contribution of Local Government Loans to Youths on Income Increment: a Case Study of Mafinga Town Council, Iringa Region, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Areti Panaoura, Frederick Univeristy, Cyprus.

(2) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Mustanir, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng, Indonesia.

(2) Mojtaba Sedighi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anju Singh, India.

(2) Dadang Yunus Lutfiansyach, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia.

(3) S. Jaya Bharathi, Coimbatore Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(4) Susmita Sarkar, Jyoti Nivas College Autonomous, India.

(5) S. Vasantha, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(6) Ukachukwu, Chukwuma Chinedu, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahmad Mustanir, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mojtaba Sedighi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing Decision to Shift from Non-stem to Stem-related College Programs among Students in a Catholic University

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Nasser Mustapha, Senior Lecturer, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajasekaran S, College of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman.

(2) Constance Chifamba, Solusi University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo Mario Lacues Apud, Catholic University of Uruguay, Uruguay.

(2) Minati Rani Mohapatra, India.

(3) N. Samuel Babu, Holy Mary Institute of Technology & Science, India.

(4) Otaiza Cupare Castro, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Venezuela.

(5) Oyarinde Oluremi N, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(6) Tsuyoshi Usagawa, Kumamoto University, Japan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Roleen B. Moleño, Carmen National High School-Senior High School, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rajasekaran S, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Constance Chifamba, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Profile Characteristics of Extension Personnel in Association with Attitude towards the Service Delivery System of Agro Service Centres

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Sudhakar Talathi, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) N. Samuel Babu, Holy Mary Institute of Technology& Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. S. Kalamkar, Sardar Patel University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manoj Sudhakar Talathi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (N. Samuel Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Knowledge of Pomegranate Growers of Banaskantha District, Gujarat on Pomegranate Production Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja Krishna J, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Kavita Digambarrao Chopde, SVDCA, Dr.Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Adewole Olukorede, Italy.

(2) Parveen Kumar, SKUAST, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pooja Krishna J, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kavita Digambarrao Chopde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An In-depth Examination of Validity Assessment: Exploring Diverse Methodologies and Dimensions of Validity in Social Research Studies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Akram Jafari- Melise Talia, SPPU, India.

(2) Claudio Zancan, Instituto Nacional De Propriedade Industrial, Brazil.

(3) B.Sankara Gomathi, Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(4) Onyekwelu Rose U., Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Akram Jafari- Melise Talia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Claudio Zancan, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (B. Sankara Gomathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Onyekwelu Rose U., Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Profitability of Fish Production in Selected Districts of North Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Grace O. Tona, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Shahram Gilaninia, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) S. P. Singh, Sher-e-Kashmir University and Agricultural Sciences & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Sudhan, TNJFU, FCRI, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mu Mu Han, Myanmar Maritime University, Myanmar.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Grace O. Tona, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shahram Gilaninia, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (S. P. Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating Constraints-Faced by Farmers in the Adoption of Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana in Rajasthan State of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Diego Matsvange, National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jeff Lamptey, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sanjib Kumar Datta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Diego Matsvange, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Green Compost Processed Organic Fertilizer and Chlorella Microalgae Solution on Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b, Carotenoid and Proline Content of Tropaeolum majus under Drought Stress

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Oni Funmilayo Lewiska, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Jarina Joshi, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(3) Hazlina Ahamad Zakeri, Universiti Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Luis Carlos Montenegro Ruiz, National University of Colombia, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Lai-Hock Tey, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

(2) Sylvia Vazquez Zeballos, Uruguay.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Oni Funmilayo Lewiska, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jarina Joshi, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hazlina Ahamad Zakeri, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA