Peer Review History: Dynamic Interdependence: Analysing BSE SENSEX and its Relationship with Global Stock Indices from 2018 to 2022

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Siddesh Pai, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, National Institute of Construction Management and Research, India.

(2) Tayyab Zeeshan Shahid, University of Engineering & Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sreedhara Ramesh Chandra, Atria Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Reza Lotfi, Yazd University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Siddesh Pai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tayyab Zeeshan Shahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Core Skills and Competencies for Inclusion in the Curriculum for Effective Performance of Extension Professionals

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hj. Zunuwanas Bin Mohamad, Politeknik Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Malaysia.

(2) Berinde Sorin-Romulus, “Babeș-Bolyai” University, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hj. Zunuwanas Bin Mohamad, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Berinde Sorin-Romulus, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Designing and Validation of e-module on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharif Mohd, Delhi University, India.

(2) Woo, Kai Yin, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Minati Rani Mohapatra, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sharif Mohd, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Woo, Kai Yin, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Some Hemostatic Changes in Pregnant Women Attending FMC keffi, Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, University of Buenod Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Akmal El-Mazny, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Syed Aslam Shah, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Najeba Farhad Salih, Koya University, Iraq.

(2) Tumbanatham, Kaloji Narayan Rao University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Akmal El-Mazny, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Syed Aslam Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Integrated Nutrient Management of Biochemical Attributeson Aonla (Ebmblica officinallis Garetn.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, Assistant Professor, CV Raman Global University, Bubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Reviewers:

(1) T.S. Mishra, India.

(2) Ashutosh Kumar, Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana, ISCTE-iul. Lisbon University Portugal, Portugal.

(2) Ramin SamieiFard, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. S. Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ashutosh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Assessment of Some Nigerian Branded Honey

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. J. Rodolfo Rendón Villalobos, Professor, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Assi Kaudjhis Chimene, Universite Felix Houphouet Boigny, Côte D’ivoire.

(2) Melkam Aleme, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

(3) El Attmani Mohammed, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Assi Kaudjhis Chimene, Côte D’ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Melkam Aleme, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (El Attmani Mohammed, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Receiver Operating Characteristic Optimization Based on Convex Hull and Evolutionary Algorithm

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Bsiss, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Morocco.

(2) R. Manjula Devi, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mudasir M. Kirmani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of agricultural Sciences & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Lasisi Salami Lawal, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammed Bsiss, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R. Manjula Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Using of Eggenberger–Polya Distribution as an Alternative Model for Dry Spell Analysis in Northern Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Professor, ISTA-School of Technology and Architecture, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Majeed Rashid Zaidan, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) S. Prakasam, A. V. V. M Sri Pushpam College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raju Nellutla, Guru Nanak Institutions Technical Campus (A), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Isra Natheer Alkallak, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Majeed Rashid Zaidan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Prakasam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Fungi-mediated Biodegradation Pathway of Polymers in Environmental Systems(Dump Sites)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Asuelimen Steve Osagie, Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Shital P. Dehankar, Shivaji University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Abdul Rahmman AL-Maeni, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(2) Oyekemi Olubamise Akinmusire, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asuelimen Steve Osagie, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shital P. Dehankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Soil Composition on Heavy Metal Uptake and Distribution in White Clover (Trifolium repens L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Manal Moustafa, Cairo University, Giza 12211, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Claudia Irina Koncsag, Ovidius University of Constanța, Romania.

(2) S. P. Sangeetha, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nibal Khaleel Mousa, Iraq.

(2) Omayma EL- Sayed Ahmed Mousa, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) S. Torbati, Urmia University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Claudia Irina Koncsag, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. P. Sangeetha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA