Peer Review History: Documenting and Analyzing Targeted Interventions of State Fishery Department of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Wafai Z. A. Mikhail, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Almamy Sylla, Université des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de Bamako, Mali.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Ikbal Illijas, Indonesia.

(2) S. P. Biswas, Dibrugarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rohasliney Hashim, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Thunyawadee Sucharidtham, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Wafai Z. A. Mikhail, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Almamy Sylla, Mali) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Assessment of Different Culture of Media on the Isolation and Purification of Cauliflower Alternaria Leaf Spot Disease Caused by Alternaria brassicicola (Schwein)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roman Ioana, Associate Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ntanbo Mbuya, University of Lubumbashi, Congo.

(2) Ma. Dolores Castañeda Antonio, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Eswari, Mohan Babu University, India.

(2) P. Muthulakshmi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ntanbo Mbuya, Congo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ma. Dolores Castañeda Antonio, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints Perceived by the Members of FPOs in Varanasi District, Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Jerusa Souza Andrade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Universidade Nilton Lins, Brazil.

(2) Sajad A. Saraf, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Subhadip Pal, The Neotia University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jerusa Souza Andrade, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sajad A. Saraf, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Editorial Comment | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influential Factors that Affect Farmers’ Intention toward Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Raza Ejaz, Institute of Agri. Extension Education and Rural Development, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) S. Prakash, Thiagarajar College of Preceptors, India.

(3) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bai Koyu, Rajiv Gandhi University, India.

(2) Catine Chimene, Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique.

(3) Udokang Anietie Edem, Nigeria.

(4) Viktar Lemiasheuski, International Sakharov Environmental Institute of Belarusian State University, Belarus.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) HJ. Mustafa Bin Dakian, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak (UNIRAZAK), Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raza Ejaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Editorial Comment | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship between Socio-economic Characteristics of Sugarcane Growers with Their Knowledge and Adoption Level of IPM Practices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tulus T.H. Tambunan, Professor, Center for Industry, University of Trisakti, Indonesia.

(2) Dr. Varsha Rani, Assistant Professor, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.

(3) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) Naresh Chaudhari, Ganpat University, Kantabne Kashiram Institute of Agricultural Sciences and Research, India.

(3) Jajnaseni Rout, Ravenshaw University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.82/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Naresh Chaudhari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jajnaseni Rout, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pushkarmoola (Inula racemosa Hook. F.): A Healing Legacy Unveiled – Exploring its Potent Anti-Pyretic and Medicinal Significance

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

(2) Dr. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

(3)Dr. Ali Nokhodchi, Professor, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Bhramaramba, Sir Cr Reddy College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Sagarika Majhi, I. T. S College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Akinlolu Bankole Fawehinmi, Nigeria College of Natural Medicine Technology, Nigeria.

(4) Neelakanta J. Sajjanar, Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science and Research, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(5) Madhu Toshniwal, Govt. Women Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniela Stoin, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I”, Romania.

(2) Jivan Rameshrao Kote, Vishwasrao Naik Arts and Commerce Mahavidyalay, Baba Naik Science Mahavidyalay, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Assumpta Ugenyi, University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Nigeria.

(2) Celso Eduardo Olivier, Instituto Alergoimuno de Americana, Brazil.

(3) G. Swathi, Government  Degree and PG College, India.

(4) Henry Ogbonna, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

(5) Yuliani Ni Nyoman, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (R. Bhramaramba, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sagarika Majhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Akinlolu Bankole Fawehinmi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Neelakanta J. Sajjanar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Madhu Toshniwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of Hepato-Protective Activity of Psidium guajava Fruit Extract against Hepatic Injured Rodent Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Professor, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Kamalam, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Desmond Nkrumah, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(3) Patrick Martin, University of Artois, France.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) José Manuel Neves, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Portugal.

(2) Mabel Calina De França Paz, Universidade Federal De Campina Grande, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Miricescu Daniela, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Kamalam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Desmond Nkrumah, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Patrick Martin, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Graded Fertility Levels and Zinc Application Method with and without Farm Yard Manure on Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Soil under Rice Crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suddhasuchi Das, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Herojit Singh Athokpam, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atinafu Tunebo Lafebo, Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suddhasuchi Das, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Herojit Singh Athokpam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Sulphur Nanoparticles on the Growth and Yield of Groundnut-Mustard Crop Sequence in Central Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Farhan Ahmad, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.

(2) Nweze Basil Obasi, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Farhan Ahmad, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nweze Basil Obasi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Editorial comment | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Phosphorous and Boron on Growth and Yield of Rice Bean

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Namita Joshi, Gurukula Kangri Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Lalit M. Patil, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abanda Well Victorien Bienvenu, Cameroon.

(2) Amjad Abdul-Hadi Mohammed, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Namita Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lalit M. Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA