Peer Review History: Monitoring and Control System for Precision Agriculture Using Wireless Sensor Network

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Biswapati Jana, Vidyasagar University, India.

(2) Archana R Raut, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rudramurthy V C, Global Academy of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Angel Rafael Valera, Romulo Gallegos University, Venezuela.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Biswapati Jana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Archana R Raut, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Development and Alternative Solutions for the Development of Small and Medium Industries in Hst Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Associate Professor, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Abraha Negash, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Francisco Ureña Prieto, Universidad Nacional de educación a Distancia, España.

(3) Bijan Yavar, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dickson Mdhlalose, National Electronic Media Institute of South Africa, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abraha Negash, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Francisco Ureña Prieto, España) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Bijan Yavar, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of Antihypertensive & Anti-hyperlipidemic Activity of Allium sativum and Rauwolfia serpentine in Hypertension and High Fat Induced Rat Model

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Amipara, GTU, India.

(2) P Ravichandran, Saveetha University, India.

(3) Manoj Kumar Saurabh, AIIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Edy Parwanto, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia.

(2) Haron M. Njoroge, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(3) Lilis Lisnawati, Respati College of Health Sciences General, Indonesia.

(4) Muharni, University of Sriwijaya, Indonesia.

(5) Suticha Kittayaruksakul, Navamindradhiraj University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Avinash Singh, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.

(2) José D. Méndez, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico.

(3) Kosasih, Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia.

(4) Aguvaran R, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

(5) Valdemir José Alegre Salles, University of Taubaté, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amipara, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 ((P Ravichandran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Manoj Kumar Saurabh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural -News Visibility in Indian Newspapers: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Armiyau Buhari Khalid, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Smita Rahul Kolhe, MAFSU, India.

(3) Eman Metwally Mohamed Arafat, Modern University for Technology and Information, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Iryna Illiash, West Ukrainian National University, Ukraine.

(2) Tadele Bayu, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

(3) Yoyon Haryanto, Bogor Agricultural Development Polytechnic, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hadaf Hashem Mohammed, University of Baghdad, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iraq.

(2) Nyevero Maruzani, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Armiyau Buhari Khalid, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Smita Rahul Kolhe, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Eman Metwally Mohamed Arafat, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Price, Service Quality, Product Quality on Customer Satisfaction at PT. Dynamic Buah Nusantara

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Christina Esti Susanti, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia.

(2) Mahmoud Alghizzawi, Amman Arab University, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Wong Tik Tsuen, Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong.

(2) Asiamah Yeboah, Kumasi Technical University, Ghana.

(3) Oyerinde Oluyinka Moses, Nigeria.

(4) Pallav Mukhopadhyay, West Bengal State University, India.

(5) S.Ramya, Srimad Andavan Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Muhammad Faizal Bin Samat, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Christina Esti Susanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahmoud Alghizzawi, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strangulated Pericecal Internal Hernia –Two Case Reports

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Carlos S Ruggeri, Italian Hospital Buenos Aires, Argentina.

(2) Julian E. Losanoff, University of Nevada, USA.

(3) Cirimbei Ciprian, Institute of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sunny Doodu Mante, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bushra Jasim Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Tugay Tartar, Firat University, Türkiye.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carlos S Ruggeri, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Julian E. Losanoff, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Cirimbei Ciprian, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Organic Manures and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yashwant SinghM, Government College, India.

(2) Umesh Kumar Acharya, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ary Susatyo Nugroho, PGRI Semarang University, Indonesia.

(2) Avdesh Bhardawaj, India.

(3) Jomell M. Santiago, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A. Senthilkumar, The Indian Agriculture College, India.

(2) Jomell M. Santiago, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

(3) S. Mohandas, Agrl. College and Research Institute, India.

(4) Soha Elsayed Khalil, NRC, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yashwant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Umesh Kumar Acharya, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sowing Time and Spacing Influenced Yield, Quality and Economics of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mamta Rathore, CSAUAT, India.

(2) V. N. Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jaime Thissen, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mamta Rathore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (V. N. Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Foliar Feeding of Borax, Zinc Sulphate and Their Intraction on Post Harvest Losses and Economy of Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Cv. Gwalior 27

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, RRTTS, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Namita Joshi, Gurukula Kangri Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Seyyed Fazel Fazeli Kakhki, Khorasan Razavi Agriculture Research and Education Center, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Koudegnan Comlan Mawussi, University of Lomé, Togo.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Namita Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Seyyed Fazel Fazeli Kakhki, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Institutional Delivery in Bangladesh: A Multilevel Analysis of a Nationwide Population-Based Survey

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Farkad Hawas Musa, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Agustin Joison, Catholic University, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amaka Ngozi Ocheke, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Siniša Franjić, Croatia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alfred A. Osoro, Uzima University, Kenya.

(2) AM Hoque, South Africa

(3) Aurélio Costa, Federal Universty Pernambuco, Brazil.

(4) K. R. Padma, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam Women’s University, India.

(5) Maria Nauside Pessoa Da Silva, Centro Universitário Maurício De Nassau Aliança, Brasil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Farkad Hawas Musa, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Agustin Joison, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Editorial comment | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA