Peer Review History: Assessment of Crop-Water Requirement of Alfalfa Using FAO-CROPWAT Model-8.0

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Moses Nnah Pius, Usmanu Danfodio University, Nigeria.

(2) Edgar Arturo Chávez Urbiola, IPN Applied Science and Advanced Technology Research Center, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ngambong Ngwafu Tita Blandine, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Moses Nnah Pius, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Edgar Arturo Chávez Urbiola, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Dates of Sowing and Spacing on Growth and Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Sedara, Iowa State University, USA.

(2) Andrey Kapustin, Institute of Living Systems, North-Caucasus Federal University, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gehan Shaker Hanna Bakhoum, Agricultural and Biological Res.Institu, Egypt.

(2) Reza Rahmatollahi, Atatürk University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Adewale Sedara, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Andrey Kapustin, Russia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Feasibility of Carnation Cultivation in the Nilgiris District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Sadasivam, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Subhadip Pal, School of Agriculture and Allied Sciences, The Neotia University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) GP Hadebe, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. Sadasivam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Subhadip Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Boron and Zinc on Vegetables: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Edward Ching-Ruey, Luo, Associate Professor, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Shahadat Hossen, Bangladesh.

(2) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Amit A. Shahane, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahlam Ahmed Hassan, Egypt.

(2) Cardei Petru, Romania.

(3) Ernane Miranda Lemes, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brazil.

(4) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia.

(5) Iman Santosa, Indonesia.

(6) Kerrouche Ibrahim, University of Constantine 1, Algeria.

(7) Lalit M. Patil, Krishi VIgyan Kendra, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) María Gretel Michel Barba, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Md. Shahadat Hossen, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amit A. Shahane, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Morphology, Anatomy and Phytochemistry of Cyrtosperma senegalense (Schott) Engl. and Alocasia macrorrhizos L. (Araceae)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Olena Grechana, Zaporizhzhya State Medical and Pharmacy University, Ukraine.

(2) Nelida Soria Rey, National University of Pilar, Paraguay.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shweta Chitnis, Mithibai College, India.

(2) Warsi, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ekhlas Qanber Jasim, University of Basrah, College of Science, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Olena Grechana, Ukraine) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nelida Soria Rey, Paraguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Usefulness of Multivariate Analysis in Forestry Research: A Case Study of Wild Pomegranate (Punica granatum L)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) W U L Ambagaspitiya, Sri Lanka.

(2) Sufia Zaman, Techno India University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Isaac Sarfo, Henan University, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dhia Ahmed Taain, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (W U L Ambagaspitiya, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sufia Zaman, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Radiology on the Early Identification of Waterhouse-friderichsen Syndrome: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V. V. Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Saket Sanjeev Patwardhan, Kulkarni Urosurgery Institute, India.

(2) Mihai Dumitrascu, Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Emergency Hospital, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rania Essameldein Mohamed Ali, Tanta University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Saket Sanjeev Patwardhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mihai Dumitrascu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Homoplastic Hypophysation of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus, Burchell 1822) Using Catfish Pituitary Gland with Coconut Water as Extender Agent

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Chaudhary, CHRIST Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Jesús G. Rodríguez Diego, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Punit Saraswat, Lachoo Memorial College of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aditi Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jesús G. Rodríguez Diego, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Selection of Proteolytic Bacteria from the Digestive Tract of Vanname Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Meena, Senior Scientist, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (CIFRI), Monirampore, Barrackpore, Kolkata, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushree Sangeeta Dey, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

(2) Eduardo Alfredo Zarza Meza, Universidad Veracruzana, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fereidun Mohebbi, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sushree Sangeeta Dey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eduardo Alfredo Zarza Meza, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History:Miller Fischer Syndrome: A Case Report and Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hab. Mariusz Cycon, Assistant Professor, School of Pharmacy, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakshi Arora, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College, India.

(2) Tahrir N. Aldelaimi, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Paul Joae Brett Nito, Universitas Sari Mulia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sakshi Arora, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tahrir N. Aldelaimi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Editorial Comment | File 1 | Na


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA