Peer Review History: Morphological Evaluation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes Based on DUS Characteristics and Character Association among Seed Yield Characters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hussan Ara Begum, Abdul Wali Khan University, Pakistan.

(2) Clement Gyeabour Kyere, Seventh-day Adventist College of Education, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ziba Ghasimi Hagh, Shahrood University of Technology, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) Renato L. Lapitan, University of the Philippines Los Banos, Philippines.

(3) Temesgen Teressa, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, EIAR, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hussan Ara Begum, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Clement Gyeabour Kyere, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification and Morph-metric Characterization of Powdery Mildew Infecting Diverse Host Plants of Southern Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamran Samiei, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) George Timothy, Kaimosi Friends University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ir. Joko Prasetyo, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Sunita Mahapatra, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kamran Samiei, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (George Timothy, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Nature and Causes of Deterioration in Fruits and Vegetables

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Erna K, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Shaimaa Jassim Alsultany, College of Science, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abdelasziz Nadir Shehata Mohamed, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maria Erna K, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shaimaa Jassim Alsultany, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Efficacy of Plant Growth Substances on Vegetative Growth Traits and Fruiting Behaviour in Strawberry c.v. Winter Down under Open Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Murugesan, Pachaiyappa’s College, India.

(2) Desta Ekero Dagata, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maritza Vacca Molina, National University of Salta, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Satya Vart Dwivedi, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Murugesan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Desta Ekero Dagata, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey of Frontier Technological Approaches to Mitigate Climate Change

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Hafiz Bin Ibrahim, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Sanjeev Kumar, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) D. Vanitha, SCSVMV University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohd Hafiz Bin Ibrahim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sanjeev Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Characterization of Mesoporous Nanosilica Derived from Rice Husk Ash

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Azizul Isha, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Soumya Mukherjee, Kazi Nazrul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) V. Priya, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Kartika Rathore, Jai Narain Vyas University, India.

(2) Madiha Batool, Pakistan.

(3) Mrunalini R Kanvinde, D Y Patil Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Azizul Isha, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Soumya Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Home Management Practices among Caregivers on Malaria Treatment in Primary Healthcare Centre Amansea, Anambra State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, Professor, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Neera Kapoor, IGNOU, India.

(2) Blego Sedionoto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bonaventure Tientche, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Neera Kapoor, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Blego Sedionoto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Factors Influencing Utilization of Reproductive Health Services for Adolescents and Youth in Samburu County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Myo Khin, Myanmar.

(2) Valmin Ramos Da Silva, Universidade Estadual De Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Johnbosco Mamah, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(2) Ragini Mehrotra, Motilal Nehru Medical College, India.

(3) Shashi Chopra, Punjab Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(4) Siddappa Naragatti, India.

(5) Vinu Choudhary, Bisu Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Anandhasayanam A, SSM College of Pharmacy, TN Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Myo Khin, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Valmin Ramos Da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Editorial Comment | File 1 | Na


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Seed Treatment and Media on Shoot Growth of Ashwagandha, Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Olha Shapoval, Kharkiv National Medical University, Ukraine.

(2) Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana, ISCTE, Lisbon University, Portugal.

(3) Nema Ram, S. K. N. Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ernesto Cervantes López, National Institute of Statistics and Geography, México.

(2) Mohammed Ali Makki AlRubaee, Wasit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Olha Shapoval, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nema Ram, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pasteuria spp. as Biocontrol Agent against Plant-Parasitic Nematodes: An Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Anand Choudhary, College of Agriculture, Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

(2) S. Prabhu, TNAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Salma Javed, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anand Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA