Peer Review History: Commercial Plant Nurseries in Kerala, India: A Critical Analysis of Key Success Drivers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Pragalbh Tiwari, College of Forestry, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, India.

(2) Vedika Sharma, Eternal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pragalbh Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vedika Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Engaging Biodiversity Management Committee (BMC) Members in Conservation Training Programs: A Case Study from Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Omkar Gupta, College of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, VNMKV, India.

(2) S. Mohamed Ramlath Sabura, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(3) Subrat Kumar Panigrahi, Maa Manikeshwari University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omkar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Mohamed Ramlath Sabura, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Subrat Kumar Panigrahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Vermicompost and Biofertilizers on Growth and Yield of Strawberry (Fragaria х ananassa Duch.) cv. Camarosa

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shibnath Basfore, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Amit Saurabh, Eternal University, India.

(3) Pavan K. Patel, Gujarat Natural Farming Science University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shibnath Basfore, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Saurabh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pavan K. Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Cytarabine+ Daunorubicin (7+3) Versus Azacitidine and Venetoclax during Induction Chemotherapy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alberto Olaya Vargas, Professor, National Institute of Pediatric, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhagwat Ajay Ashok, Samarth College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Sarab Hesham Moulod, AL-Iraqia University College of Medicine, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhagwat Ajay Ashok, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarab Hesham Moulod, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Empirical Study on the Progression of Self Help Groups in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Assistant Professor, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Abdul Jamal, The New College (University of Madras), India.

(2) Parag Jyoti Kashyap, Assam University, India.

(3) Anoj Chhetri, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Abdul Jamal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parag Jyoti Kashyap, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anoj Chhetri, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Analgesic Potential of Dibenzylidene Derivatives of Cyclopentanone

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Prasong Srihanam, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(2) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Singh, School of Pharmacy, Rai University, India.

(2) Ferydoon Khamooshi, University of Zabol, Iran.

(3) B Lakshminarayanan, Sanjo College of Pharmaceutical Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ferydoon Khamooshi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B Lakshminarayanan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Ecotourism Development and Land Use Planning in Muara District, North Tapanuli, Indonesia: A Policy Review for the Lake Toba Shoreline

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kamo P. Chilingaryan, Associate professor, Peoples’ Friendship University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Marlina, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(2) Natasa Danilovic Hristic, Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, Serbia.

(3) I Putu Putra Astawa,S.Kom.,M.Kom, Hindu University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marlina, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Natasa Danilovic Hristic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (I Putu Putra Astawa,S.Kom.,M.Kom, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial and Metabolites Dynamics during the Fermentation of Artisanal Drinks: Screening and Estimation from “cha’a” and “arky” Consumed in Yaoundé-Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Sukhminderjit Kaur, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Sawsan Mahmood, Tartous University, Syria.

(3) Pritha Ghosh, St. Pious X Degree and PG College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sukhminderjit Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sawsan Mahmood, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pritha Ghosh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil Fertility, Crop Productivity, Cropping Intensity and Livelihood Enhancement in Titabar, Assam, India: A Participatory Approach through Farmer FIRST Programme

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Mello, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil.

(2) Jose Antonio Valles Romero, University of The Incarnate Word, United States.

(3) Chiam Chooi Chea, Open University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Mello, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jose Antonio Valles Romero, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chiam Chooi Chea, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation, Evaluation and Stability Studies of Dutasteride Loaded Niosomal Gel

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogesh Chaudhary, Madan Bhandari Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal.

(2) Ujwala Desai, PES Modern College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogesh Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ujwala Desai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA