Peer Review History: Formulation and Standardization of Gujarati Snack (KHAKHRA) Fortified with Whole Unripe Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) Powder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. João Miguel Dias, Associate Professor, CESAM, University of Aveiro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrei Zbuchea, District Emergency Hospital of Ploiesti, Romania.

(2) Danilet Vi M. Mendoza, College of Arts and Sciences, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Andrei Zbuchea, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Danilet Vi M. Mendoza, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Historical Monthly and Annual Rainfall and Temperature Variability (1980–2020) in Baringo Couny County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Edward Ching-Ruey, Luo, Associate Professor, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Willis O. Aguko, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.

(2) El Attmani Mohammed, University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alexey Ju.Retejum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.

(2) Koua Tanoh Jean-Jacques, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(3) Şeyma Merve Kaymaz Mühling, Turkey.

(4) Walid Nabil, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Awuh Mbia Ekolok, University of  Bamenda, Cameroon.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Willis O. Aguko, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (El Attmani Mohammed, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Utilization of Nanobodies in Immunoturbidimetric Assays

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, EPSO, University Miguel Hernandez, Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.

(2) Dr. Anil Kumar, Professor & Head, Devi Ahilya University, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Ahmed Khadim, Al-Bayan University, Iraq.

(2) Muhammad Abdurrahman Munir, Alma Ata University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Malancus Razvan Nicolae, Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hayder Ahmed Khadim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muhammad Abdurrahman Munir, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Risk Management in Medical Device Industry

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhavya B. M, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(2) Manjusha Mahakarkar, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Radhikabai Meghe Memorial College of Nursing, India.

(3) Gyanendra Prasad Paudel, National College, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(4) Yosra Ben Fadhel, The Higher Institute of Medical Technologies, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Albina Amin, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.

(2) Areeeg Kamel Mahdi, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(3) Dacyr Dante de Oliveira Gatto, UNINOVE- Universidade Nove de Julho, Brazil.

(4) Dimitrios G. Konstantinides, University of the Aegean, Greece.

(5) Fiayaz Aleem Shaama, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

(6) Fülöp Melinda Timea, Babeş–Bolyai University, Romainia.

(7) Gabriela Gheorghiu, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania.

(8) Heber Anandan, Dr. Agarwal’s Eye Hospital, India.

(9) Luiz Roberto Nascimento, ENS-Brazilian School of Insurance, Brazil.

(10) Venkatesh Kamath B, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bhavya B. M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Manjusha Mahakarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gyanendra Prasad Paudel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Yosra Ben Fadhel, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Mutagenesis on the Production of Mycelia Growth of Auricularia Species in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ileana Andreica, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Samir Mohamed Elrayes, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(3) Maria Belem Arce Vazquez, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Ecatepec, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adebayo Ismail Abiola, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.

(2) Kruti Dave, Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tajudeen Yahaya, Federal University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ileana Andreica, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Samir Mohamed Elrayes, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maria Belem Arce Vazquez, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study of Phytochemical Analysis and Pharmacological Activities of Withania somnifera

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Former Professor, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ioana Stanciu, University of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) M. Dhanasekaran, Govt. Arts College, India.

(3) Ehab Abdel Aziz Ahmed El-Shaarawy, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Gupta, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Bahareh Allahverdi-Mamaghani, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

(3) Dorly, IPB University, Indonesia.

(4) Durga Madhab Kar, Siksha O Anusandhan, India.

(5) Gloria Helena González Blair, Colombia.

(6) Hemant Sarin, USA.

(7) H G S P Hewageegana, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(8) Robert Suslo, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.

(9) Vishwas Sovani, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ioana Stanciu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. Dhanasekaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ehab Abdel Aziz Ahmed El-Shaarawy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Validation of a Mobile Application for Predicting the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage in Patients Operated for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Assistance Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Spinder Kour, K.D Medical College, India.

(2) Yun Deng, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China.

(3) Andrews Jose, APJ KTU, Karunya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adem Beriso Bejo, Madda Walabu University, Ethiopia.

(2) Anish Chandy, CSVTU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Baqer J. hasan, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(2) Zainab Mahmood Aljammali, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Spinder Kour, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yun Deng, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Andrews Jose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Utilization of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in Evaluating Unconscious Patients among Clinical Nurses in a Nigerian Referral Health Centre

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Romulo Dias Novaes, Professor, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ana Quenia Gomes da Silva, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(2) S. P. Indra Kumar, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ana Quenia Gomes da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. P. Indra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Changes of Meibomian Gland in Anopthalmic Patients Wearing PMMA Prosthetic Eyes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Assistance Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kanav Gupta, NC Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Saba Kausar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mohammed Nader Shalaby, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(2) Saba Kausar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kanav Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Saba Kausar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification and Quantification of Phytochemicals in Ethanol Leaf Extract of Emilia praetermissa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Professor, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Arturo O. Manipon, Philippines.

(2) Dyah Koesoemawardani, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Arturo O. Manipon, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dyah Koesoemawardani, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA