Peer Review History: The Role of P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) in Cancer Multidrug Resistance (MDR): Challenges for Inhibiting P-gp in the Context of Overcoming MDR

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejeshwari B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

(2) Majid Mohammed Mahmood, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(3) Shaikh Ayesha Parveen, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) S. Vijaya Peterraj, University of Madras, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tejeshwari B V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Majid Mohammed Mahmood, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shaikh Ayesha Parveen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey of Nivolumab and Lenvatinib for the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Associate Professor, Muthayammal Centre for Advanced Research (MCAR), Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Saxena, School of Biotechnology, IFTM University, India.

(2) Ibrahim Mohamed Saeed Shnawa, College of Biotechnology, University of Qasim, Hilla University, College Babylon, Iraq.

(3) Pankaj Shankar Kore, Rajarambapu College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Arun Dhungana, KU, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zafar Mehmood, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bahaa Kenawy Abuel Hussien, Minia University, Egypt.

(2) Davi Félix Martins Junior, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana – UEFS, Brazil.

(3) Jitendriya Panigrahi

(4) Shri Alpesh N Patel Postgraduate Institute of Science and Research, Anand Affiliated to Sardar Patel University, India.

(5) Mohd Shihabuddin Ahmad Noorden, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

(6) Pragati Khare, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prashant Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ibrahim Mohamed Saeed Shnawa, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Pankaj Shankar Kore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Arun Dhungana, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Derived Reduced Balanced Incomplete Block Design

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Professor, ISTA-School of Technology and Architecture, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sangeeta Garg, Mewar Institute of Management, CCS University, India.

(2) Janette C. Lagos, College of Science, Pamantasan Ng Lungsod Ng Maynila, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) K. Chandrashekar, Guru Nanak Institutions Technical Campus, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sangeeta Garg, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Janette C. Lagos, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Some New Optimal Bounds for Wallis Ratio

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Danilo Costarelli, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Changjin X, PR China.

(2) Tim Tarver, Bethune-Cookman University, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Changjin Xu, PR China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tim Tarver, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Norm-Attainable Polynomials: Characterizations and Properties in Orthogonal Polynomial Families

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Mohamed Awi, University of Tripoli, Libya.

(2) Sammy Musundi, Chuka University, Kenya.

(3) Shpetim Rexhepi, State University of Tetova,  North Macedonia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R. Praveen Sam, G.Pulla Reddy Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amr Mahdy, Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ali Mohamed Awi, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sammy Musundi, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shpetim Rexhepi, North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Wider Classes of Estimators in Adaptive Cluster Sampling

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Professor, ISTA-School of Technology and Architecture, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Feno Daniel Rajaonasy, University of Toamasina, Madagascar.

(2) Muhammad Shahimi Bin Ariffin, College of Computing, Informatics & Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hussaini Abubakar, Hussaini Adamu Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Said Agoujil, University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Espiritu Martinez Antony Paul, National Autonomous High Andean University, Perú.

(2) K. Radha, Thanthai Periyar Government Arts and Science College, India.

(3) Nathier. A. Ibrahim, Al – Turath University College, Iraq.

(4) Rasha  Jalal  Mitlif, University of Technology, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Feno Daniel Rajaonasy, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muhammad Shahimi Bin Ariffin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Gaming Performance: A Recommender System for Selecting Optimal Gaming Headsets Based on SAW Method

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematical Sciences, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kanimozhi Kannabiran, NPR College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Rijwan Khan, ABES Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Junaid Arshad, Virtual University of Pakistan, Pakistan.

(2) Ts. Nurasma’ Binti Shamsuddin, Multimedia University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kanimozhi Kannabiran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rijwan Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Siderophore Production by Different Promising Microbial Isolates

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186 México City, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinu V, ICAR, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India.

(2) Titiya Netwong, Suan Dusit University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sayyed Mahmoud Enjavinezhad, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vinu V, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Titiya Netwong, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Weed Management Practices on Growth, Yield of Vegetable Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) cv. Kashi Kanchan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) E. Aruna, India.

(2) Chathura Perera, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (E.Aruna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chathura Perera, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preparation and Characterization of Fish Protein Isolate from Tiger Tooth Croaker (Otholithus ruber) Obtained through PH Shift Method

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) J Michael Antony Prabhu Arachi, Periyar Arts College, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Osun State College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Laura Stan, Univ. of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (J Michael Antony Prabhu Arachi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA