Peer Review History: Identifying the Factors Influencing the Performance of the Farmer Producer Organizations Dealing with Value Addition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) Barbara Wieliczko, Institute for Rural and Agricultural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.

(3) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Raj Kumar Yogi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.82/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Barbara Wieliczko, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Component Analysis and Identification of Ancient Glass Products Based on Statistical Methods

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Professor, ISTA-School of Technology and Architecture, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Mahiban Lindsay, Hindustan University, India.

(2) Darsha Panwar, SISTEC, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Janette C. Lagos, Philippines.

(2) Thangadurai N, Raja Rajeswari College of Engineering, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (N. Mahiban Lindsay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Darsha Panwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modeling Dependence using Copula Garch

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Amon Kiregu Macharia, Kimathi University of Technology, Kenya.

(2) N. K. Sajeevkumar, Govt. College Kariavattom, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Chaitanya Priya, Jazan University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amon Kiregu Macharia, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (N. K. Sajeevkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Complications by Ophthalmic Residents while doing Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) C. L. Avadhani, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Heba Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Francesco Rossi, Ca’foscari University of Venice, Italy.

(2) Guadalupe  Tenorio  Guajardo, Universidad  Nacional  Autónoma de México, México.

(3) Kalaiselvi.G, India.

(4) Neelapala Anil Kumar, Alliance University, India.

(5) Patitapaban Rath, Central University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Irene Scagnol, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (C. L. Avadhani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Heba Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis in Utilizing Different Diagnostic Methods for Plasmodium falciparum Detection within Owerri Municipal, Imo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):.

(1) Dr. Sandra Aparecida Marinho, Professor, Paraíba State University (Universidade Estadual da Paraíba – UEPB), Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Lai Meng Yee, University of Malaya, Malaysia.

(2) Luz Ma. Adriana Balderas Peña, UMAE Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente del, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, México.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lai Meng Yee, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luz Ma. Adriana Balderas Peña, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Weed Management Practices on the Growth, Yields and Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Samuel O. Jolaiya, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(2) Agbalajobi, Sunday Ayodele, Kwara State Polytechnic, Institute of Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Arun Kumar Ramu, PRIST Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daisy Myint, Myanmar.

(2) T. Brinda, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Harnam Singh Lodhi, K S Saket PG College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Samuel O. Jolaiya, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Agbalajobi, Sunday Ayodele, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Arun Kumar Ramu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of U.S. Quantitative Easing (QE) Announcements on Indian Government Bond Yields

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, Associate Professor, AKTU Lucknow University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mailasan Jayakrishnan, School of Computing and Data Science, Xiamen University, Malaysia.

(2) Bishwajeet Bhattacharjee, Shri Shankaracharya Technical Campus, India.

(3) Agnaldo Keiti Higuch, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Brasil.

(4) Yiming He, South China Agricultural University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ch. V. Rama Krishna Rao, RISE Krishna Sai Prakasam Group of Institutions, India.

(2) Trevor W. Chamberlain, McMaster University, Canada.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mailasan Jayakrishnan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bishwajeet Bhattacharjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Agnaldo Keiti Higuch, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Yiming He, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Millets Based Integrated Farming System for Food and Nutritional Security, Constraints and Agro-Diversification Strategies to Fight Global Hidden Hunger: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, Assistant Professor, CV Raman Global University, Bubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali H. Wheeb, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Oluchi Nwankudu, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adelle Blair, Antigua and Barbuda.

(2) Matheus Bezerra Alves Gomes, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Akas Pinaringan Sujalu, University of 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ali H. Wheeb, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Oluchi Nwankudu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Enriched Organic Manures and Bio-Enhancer on Quality, Soil Attributes and Nutrient Uptake in Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Paul Kweku Tandoh, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science Technology, Ghana.

(2) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D. Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adamu Yusuf Arku, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Carmen Otilia Rusănescu, Polytechnic University Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Dulam Shivaraj, Sri Konda Laxman Telangana State Horticultural University, India.

(4) P Soman, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Paul Kweku Tandoh, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aparna Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Introgression of Stay Green Quantitative Trait Locus (QTLS) into Elite Sorghum Variety by MABC

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol, Iran.

(2) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankur Kumar Tanwar, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Omrani, Iran.

(2) Hind Bushra Ahmed, Ahfad University for Women (AUW), Sudan.

(3) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, University of Hindu Indonesia, Indonesia.

(4) K. P. Suresh, ICAR-NIVEDI, India.

(5) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(6) Titiya Netwong, Suan Dusit University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) J. Amudha, ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ankur Kumar Tanwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA