Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Classroom-based Learning of Teachers in Relation to Curriculum Procedure of Teachers in Public Elementary Schools

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suvendu Ray, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Nimish H. Vasoya, Children’s Research University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Biplob Mallick, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suvendu Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nimish H. Vasoya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Internet Usage on the Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) B Sridevi, Saveetha Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Saroj Nayyar, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Shahzadi, University of Balochistan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abidoye, Florence Omosholape, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(2) Benson Ikechukwu Igboanugo, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Nigeria.

(3) Blessing Chinyere Cleopas, Federal University Otuoke, Nigeria.

(4) Metasebya Gonta Gotoro, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B Sridevi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saroj Nayyar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shahzadi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of a Finned Solar Air Collector: Numerical and Experimental Investigation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Natt Makul, Assistant Professor, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Mandar Sumant, Drs Kiran & Pallavi Patel Global University, India.

(2) Ahmed H Yousif, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Faris Aissaoui, University of Ghardaia, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Réda Khama, University of Batna 2, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mandar Sumant, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed H Yousif, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Faris Aissaoui, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: CRISPR/Cas9 Construct Development for Knock-out of Root Architecture Associated 1 Gene in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yadla Hari, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (PJTAU), India.

(2) Itishree Nayak, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yadla Hari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Itishree Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc, Potassium, and Boron on Fruit Set and Retention in Kinnow Mandarin

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajendra P. Maurya, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, India.

(2) Subrata Mahato, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajendra P. Maurya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subrata Mahato, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Exploring the Horticultural Sector in Arunachal Pradesh, India: Status and Prospects

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Isela Quintero Zapata, Instituto De Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma De Nuevo León, México.

(2) Md Ilias Hossain, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Isela Quintero Zapata, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Ilias Hossain, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of FYM, Areca Husk Compost and Coir Pith Compost on Yield, Quality and Soil Properties in Babycorn Cultivation (Zea mays L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Amber Ali, Sailkot University, Pakistan.

(2) Firdoz Shahana, PJTAU, India.

(3) Alemu Andualem Zela, Bonga University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amber Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Firdoz Shahana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alemu Andualem Zela, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Influence of Secondary and Micro Nutrients Status of Soils on Grape Yield of Vineyards in Northern Dry Zone of Karnataka, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ranjan Kumar Jena, ICAR- National Rice Research Institute, India.

(2) Marina T. Stojanova, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, North Macedonia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ranjan Kumar Jena, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marina T. Stojanova, North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessing the Economic and Health Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Multivariate Analysis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandip Sarker, Bangladesh.

(2) Ashish D. Baldania, Lukhdhirji Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adebayo Moses, Miami University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandip Sarker, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish D. Baldania, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA