Peer Review History: Risk Attitude of Farmers in the Climate Extreme Region of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mokkapati Sri Rama Murthy, Sir C. R. Reddy College of Engineering, India.

(2) Henrikh Hudz, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N. Sabitha Devi, Telangana Social Welfare Residential Degree College for Women, India.

(2) Utpal Barman, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Awash Almebo Tsebe, Dilla University, Ethiopia.

(2) Irshad Ullah, Concordia College and University, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mokkapati Sri Rama Murthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Henrikh Hudz, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Crop Cover Classification Using Sentinel 2

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Balashanmugam, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Paul Gradenwitz, Wu Yi University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) S. S. Patil, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (P. Balashanmugam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Paul Gradenwitz, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges Arising from Universal Free Basic Education, Eswatini

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Camino Escolar-Llamazares, Professor, University of Burgos, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Suharmanto, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Pramila Ramani, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suharmanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pramila Ramani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing the Electronic Textbooks Adoption in Tanzanian High Schools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nawal Fadhil Abbas, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Rajasekaran S, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bijan Yavar, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(2) Florence jean b. Talirongan, Misamis University, Philippines.

(3) Ivy H. Casupanan, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines.

(4) Low Jie Ying, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

(5) Miriam Aparicio, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Argentina.

(6) Misheck Dube, North West University, Republic of South Africa.

(7) Nilton Cezar Carraro, Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil.

(8) Titiya Netwong, Suan Dusit University, Thailand.

(9) V. A. Jyothi, Govt of India, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) André Vieira Sonoda, Federal University of Paraíba, Brazil.

(2) B. V. Chalukya, Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nawal Fadhil Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rajasekaran S, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum Hybrids for Juce Yield, Ethanol Yield and its Attributing Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rani Chapara, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hem Raj Bhandari, ICAR, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Kumar Meena, ICAR-CRIJAF, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) S. Utharasu, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rani Chapara, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hem Raj Bhandari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies of Physiological and Yield Attributing Traits of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ali Hussein Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis and Identification of Chemical Content of Rice of Several Strains Local Upland Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA

Reviewers:

(1) Kushagra Dubey, Smriti College of Pharmaceutical Education, India.

(2) Rekha Rani, Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Damu Mokinda Survase, Karmaveer Ramraoji Aher College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kushagra Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rekha Rani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role and Importance of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Modern Day Agriculture by Improving Soil Rizosphere: Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, Assistant Professor, CV Raman Global University, Bubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Zeru Yimer Kebede, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Ethiopia.

(2) Muhammad Saleem, Jubail University College, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Nguyen Quang Trung, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zeru Yimer Kebede, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muhammad Saleem, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nguyen Quang Trung, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Phosphorus Sources on Soil Physico-Chemical Property Dynamics under Chickpea Crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yalçın Coşkun, Associate Professor, Lapseki Vocational College, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Muthusamy, V.O. Chidambaram College, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(2) Maria Maldonado Vega, Hospital Regional De Alta Especialidad Del Bajio, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) D. C. Alfonso Benítez de la Torre, México.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Namita Joshi, Gurukula Kangri Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Nkwopara Ugochukwu Nnamdi, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Muthusamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria Maldonado Vega, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Evaluation of Tractor Operated Onion Digger

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gorla Gayathri, Mohan Babu University, India.

(2) Shashank Shekhar, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Lahre, College of Agricultural Engineering and Post Harvest Technology, India.

(2) Sanjeev Kumar, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gorla Gayathri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shashank Shekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA