Peer Review History: Performance of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Varieties in Prayagraj Agro Climatic Condition for Growth, Yield, and Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

(3) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ndam Lawrence Monah, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(2) Macauley Asim Ittah, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Meenakshi Kumari, Galgotias University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ndam Lawrence Monah, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Macauley Asim Ittah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints of Soybean Production by Farmers in Wardha District, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Seedari Ujwala Rani, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hassan Nima Habib, University of Basrah, College of Agriculture, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ishfaq Ahmad Malik, Dibre Birhan University, Ethiopia.

(2) Manas Kumar Dhal, Swami Shraddhanand College, India.

(3) Rana Tariq Yahya, Mosul University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Seedari Ujwala Rani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hassan Nima Habib, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Varietal Evaluation of Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) for Yield and Fruits Quality Attributes under Bundelkhand Region of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Tanta University, Egypt.

(2) Girish C. Kamble, SRRL Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anise Jorfi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Edwin Ronnie Gakegne, Instituto Superior Politécnico Sol Nascente (ISPSN), Angola.

(3) Swapnil Pandey, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) D. Obeng-Ofori, Catholic University of Ghana, Ghana.

(2) Eduard Pintér, Slovak University of Agriculture, Slovak Republic.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Girish C. Kamble, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of YouTube as a Supplementary Material to Enhance the Students’ Learning Achievement in Geography

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Surina Nayan, UiTM, Malaysia.

(2) Sukris Sutiyatno, STMIK Bina Patria, Indonesia.

(3) Zuraini Mat Issa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(4) Irina-Ana Drobot, Technical University of Civil Engineering, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ramona Lacurezeanu, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

(2) Tolera Negassa Danki, Arsi University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Surina Nayan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sukris Sutiyatno, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zuraini Mat Issa, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Irina-Ana Drobot, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Instruction in Pre-Writing Strategy on Students’ Achievement in Idea Organization and Paragraphing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sulaiman Adamu Mayanchi, Zamfara State College of Education Maru, Nigeria.

(2) Eduardo Mario Lacues Apud, Catholic University, Uruguay.

(3) Wokoma Tamuno-Olo Abbott, Army Day Secondary School, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sulaiman Adamu Mayanchi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eduardo Mario Lacues Apud, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Wokoma Tamuno-Olo Abbott, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Income of Apple Growers in Kashmir: An Empirical Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nico L Sisinyize, Namibia University of Science and Technology, Namibia.

(2) Prem Kumar, Garden City University, India.

(3) Masauko Msiska, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sandip Ratna, State College of Teacher Education, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Divyang Patel, Pioneer College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Isyak Ibrahim Ogirima, Kogi State University Anyigba, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nico L Sisinyize, Namibia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prem Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Masauko Msiska, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identifying Potential Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 from Three Medicinal Plants: An in silico Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

(2) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Tanveer Hasan, Shia Post Graduate College, University of Lucknow, India.

(2) Vidhya C V, Ethiraj College for Women, India.

(3) Archan Dattatray Jadhav, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(4) Changping Li, Southwest Medical University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abate Waldetensai, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Ethiopia.

(2) Syed Khalid Mustafa, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tanveer Hasan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vidhya C V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Archan Dattatray Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Changping Li, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Descriptive Analysis of Paediatricians’ Involvement in Community Child Health in Nigeria: So Far How Far?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) E. N. Ganesh, India.

(2) Hermalinda, Andalas University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pedro Agnel Dias Miranda Neto, Brasil.

(2) Pundareekaksha Rao, Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Manikandan Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Institute of Child Health & Hospital for Children, India.

(2) Anca Luștrea, West University of Timisoara, Romania.

(3) Anil Kumar Tiwari, Bihar University of Health Sciences, India.

(4) Emmanuel Eyo-Ita, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(5) Warda Hassan Abdullah, College of Nursing, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (E. N. Ganesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hermalinda, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Production and Quality Assessment of Custard from Cornstarch Fortified with Roasted African Yam Bean and Solar Dried African Bush Mango

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, Assistant Professor, Dean, School of Science and Technology, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Luiz Carlos Ferreira, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of the Northern Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) Utthapon Issara, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Luiz Carlos Ferreira, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Utthapon Issara, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enrichment of Cd, Cr, Pb and Biological Detoxification Strategies in Sewage Irrigated Soils

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Patrick Onen, University of Kerala, India.

(2) Abba Umar Hassan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abbas Noor Alsirifi, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Omayma EL- Sayed Ahmed Mousa, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

(3) Veluru Sridevi, Andhra University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Patrick Onen, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abba Umar Hassan, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA