Peer Review History: Characterization of Finger Millet Genotypes for Terminal Moisture Stress Tolerance Using Reported Indices

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Leelatulasi Salwoom, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Abiola Toyin Ajayi, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) James Gimase, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Habtamu Zeleke, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Leelatulasi Salwoom, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abiola Toyin Ajayi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Rice Seed Production, Processing, and Distribution Training on the Stakeholders in Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Julius Gathogo, Kenyatta University, Kenya, ANCCI University, USA.

(2) Mohammad Saiful Alam Sarker, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(3) Jayanta Kumar Das, M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ch Sekhar, Vignan’s Institute of Information Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Julius Gathogo, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Saiful Alam Sarker, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jayanta Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Economic Analysis of Different Marketing Channels of Pineapple in Tseminyu District of Nagaland

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Branislav R. Tanasic, University of the People, Serbia.

(2) Eze Solomon Uchechukwu, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Setiasih Dra., Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bhakti Pembangunan, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rijwan Khan, ABES Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Seda Erkan Buğday, Cankiri Karatekin University, Türkiye.

(3) Branislav R. Tanasic, University of the People, Serbia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Branislav R. Tanasic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eze Solomon Uchechukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Eucalyptus Clones for Growth and Yield in Southern Region of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rodolfo Soares de Almeida, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil.

(2) Ashish P Lambat, Sevadal Mahila Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rodolfo Soares de Almeida, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ashish P Lambat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Eco Friendly Management of Pulse Beetle [Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius)] on Stored Black Gram [Vigna mungo (Linnaeus)] at Prayagraj, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

(2) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Biology, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:.

(1) Shyamrao Kulkarni, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Nyimas Popi Indriani, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shyamrao Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nyimas Popi Indriani, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Doubled Haploids in Crop Improvement: Unraveling Strategies, Advancements and Prospects for Enhanced Genetics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yalçın Coşkun, Associate Professor, Lapseki Vocational College, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Bineeta Singh, AKS University, India.

(2) Olfa Saddoud, Banque Nationale dde Gènes, Tunisia.

(3) Udokang Anietie Edem, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Imran Arshad, SAA Technical & Specialized Services Establishment, United Arab Emirates.

(2) N. Vivekanandan, Central Water and Power Research Station, India.

(3) S. Shahitha, Muthayammal College of Arts and science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bineeta Singh, India ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Olfa Saddoud,Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Udokang Anietie Edem, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints in Adoption of Solar Photovoltaic Water Pump Sets in Haryana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, Professor, University of Western Macedonia, Greece.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Tayyab, Islamic University of Medinah, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Abdel-Karim Daud, Palestine Polytechnic University, Palestine.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Badr Azzam, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) P. Balashanmugam, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Vilas Shamrao Bugade, KIT’s College of Engineering (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tayyab, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdel-Karim Daud, Palestine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Analysis of Cost and Returns of Chick-pea Cultivation in Chhattisgarh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jurislav Babic, Professor, University of Osijek, Croatia.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Márcia Andrade Queiroz Ozanam, University of Sao Paulo, Brasil.

(2) Ranjit Sambhaji Patil, DY Patil Agriculture and Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Márcia Andrade Queiroz Ozanam, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ranjit Sambhaji Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ensuring Patient Safety and Trust: The Critical Importance of Regulatory Compliance in Healthcare

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Maurice Barasa Silai, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(2) Sazin Islam, First Capital University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bharti Satish Weljale, Maharashta University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Ang Yee Gary, Singapore.

(3) Dinesh Kansal, India.

(4) Lucky Goh Poh Wah, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.

(5) Lucio Mango, University of International Studies of Rome (UNINT), Italy.

(6) Shivendra Verma, India.

(7) Suji Pramila R, Mar Baselios Institute of Technology and Science (MBITS), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sonlimar Mangunsong, Poltekkes Kemenkes Palembang (Health Polytechnic of Palembang), Indonesia.

(2) C.L. Avadhani, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Danelina Emilova Vacheva, Medical University of Pleven, Bulgaria.

(4) Eddy Winarso, Jenderal Achmad Yani University, Indonesia.

(5) Shah Murtaza Rashid Al Masud, University of Asia Pacific, Bangladesh.

(6) Tri Siswati, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maurice Barasa Silai, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sazin Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Regulatory Compliance in the United States: A Comprehensive Analysis of USFDA Guidelines and Implementation Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkat Ali Khan, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo Burgarelli Lages, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) Sangeeta Sharma, Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, India.

(3) Grigorios Agkyralidis, University of Athens, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Neydi Osnaya Romero, Instituto Nacional de Pediatria, México.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jose Ignacio Fernandez Montequin, Havana University, National Institu Cubate of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Cuba.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eduardo Burgarelli Lages, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sangeeta Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Grigorios Agkyralidis, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA