Peer Review History: Effects of Fermentation and Steaming on the Proximate and Antinutritional Properties of Pigeon Pea Seed Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Asok Kumar Dikshit, National Council for Cement and Building Materials, India.

(2) Goodluck Obioma Okereke, Benue State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asok Kumar Dikshit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Goodluck Obioma Okereke, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Productivity of Millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. BR.) as Influenced by Intra-row Spacing, Low Levels of Combined Organic and In-organic Fertilizers and Variety in Sokoto, Sudan Savannah, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Egypt.

(2) I Nengah Muliarta, Warmadewa University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdel Azim Abdel Aziz Yassen, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Gezahegn Fikre Ergicho, Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

(3) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

(4) Pankaj Kumar Ray, India.

(5) R Dhaya, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.

(6) R. Mahalakshmi, India.

(7) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(8) Shambhoo Prasad, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (I Nengah Muliarta, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Alternaria Blight of Linseed (Linum usitatissimum) Caused by (Alternaria lini L.) in In-vitro Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Egypt.

(2) K. M. Khalequzzaman, Spices Research Centre, BARI, Bangladesh.

(3) Andrea Verónica De Fátima Oviedo, Universidad Nacional De Tucumán, Facultad De Ciencias Naturales E Instituto Miguel Lillo, Argentina.

(4) Nguyen Thi Lang, High Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Monica Sharma, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry (Solan), India.

(2) Yan Hongfei, Hebei Agriculture University, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Muhammad Ahmad Zeshan, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. M. Khalequzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Andrea Verónica De Fátima Oviedo, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Nguyen Thi Lang, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Paclobutrazol and Potassium Nitrate on Vegetative Growth, Leaf Nutrient Status, Flowering and Yield of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapali Planted under Different Spacing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayush Madan, Shobhit Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) G. L. Kumawat, S.K.N. Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pramod Verma, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ayush Madan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (G. L. Kumawat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Packing Problem and Random Coverage in Continuous Domain

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, UNICAMP, FEEC, Brazil.

(2) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Devika G, India.

(2) Mohammed Alchaita, HIAST, Syria.

(3) Onwudebelu  Ugochukwu, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo (AE-FUNAI), Nigeria.

(4) Patsaraporn Somboonsak, Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Idrees Kocher, Duhok Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(2) L. Sankari, Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science for Women, India.

(3) Mohammad Nasar, Mazoon College, Oman.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Manu Mitra, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Inter-traits Relationship and Path Co-efficient for Fruit Yield and its Related Traits in Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch ex. Poir)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kou Hayakawa, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Japan.

(2) Mohamed Youssef Abed, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anise Jorfi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Eduard Pintér, Slovak University of Agriculture, Slovak Republic.

(3) Swapnil Pandey, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(4) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Girish  C. Kamble, SRRL Sci.College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kou Hayakawa, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohamed Youssef Abed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield Performance of Three Sulawesi Local Aromatic Upland Rice Varieties at Various Planting Spacing Distance with Alley Cropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, UNIVC, Brazil.

(2) Felix Mereka Chipojola, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prashanth Sangannavar, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Charles Nyarang’o Nyamwamu, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Jan Barwicki, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences, Poland.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Felix Mereka Chipojola, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Divergence in White Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] Genotypes for Yield and Yield Contributing Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Anthoula Gleridou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(2) Kadhim Fadhil Nasir, AL FuratAlawsat Technical University, AL Mussaib Technical College, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Imene Djelloul, Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Appliquées d’Alger, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Khairiah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia.

(2) Nilsa Gonzalez Britez, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anthoula Gleridou, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kadhim Fadhil Nasir, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficiency of Different Bio Stimulants on Chilli Crop under Prayagraj Agro Climatic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashutosh Kumar, Assistant Professor, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi-284003, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismarley Lage Horta Morais, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil.

(2) Zienab Ahmed, United Arab Emirates University, UAE.

(3) Sirpaul Jaikishun, University of Guyana, Guyana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arbaoui, University Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Algeria.

(2) Ayano Kahano, Arbaminch University of Ethiopia, Ethiopia.

(3) Chaieb Emna, ISA Chott Meriem Sousse, Tunisie.

(4) Titiya Netwong, Suan Dusit University, Thailand.

(5) Willames de Albuquerque Soares, University of Pernambuco, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.50/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ismarley Lage Horta Morais, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zienab Ahmed, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sirpaul Jaikishun, Guyana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Levels of Organic Manures on Physico-Chemical Properties of Soil under Cowpea Crop in an Inceptisol of Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruth Noemí Aguila Ramírez, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.

(2) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ruth Noemí Aguila Ramírez, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ali Hussein Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA