Peer Review History: Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield and Quality of Papaya cv. Red Lady under Prayagraj Agro Climatic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar Ramu, PRIST Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Siti Nurdjanah, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gamil Elsayed Ibrahim Ramadan, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Jesús G. Rodríguez Diego, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Arun Kumar Ramu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ali Hussein Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Household Waste and Cow Dung Proportions for Quality Vermicompost Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yashwant Singh, Government College, India.

(2) N. D. Polara, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(3) Aba-Toumnou Lucie, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mahua Banerjee, Palli Siksha Bhavana, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yashwant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (N. D. Polara, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Aba-Toumnou Lucie, Central African Republic) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Marketing of Betel Leaves through Different Marketing Channels in Bhograi Block, Balasore District of Odisha

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nchumthung Murry, GON, India.

(2) M. Natarajan, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Iyabo Adeoye, National Horticultural Research Institute, Nigeria.

(2) Valeriana Darwis, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Azam Ahmadyan, Iran.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, College of Education Zing, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nchumthung Murry, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. Natarajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Principles and Practices of Effective Food Safety Risk Communication – Introducing the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Food Safety Risk Communication Framework

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Raffaella Preti, Laboratory of Commodity Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Nazer Ali, Geethanjali College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Sangtarash N, Islamic Azad University of Shoushtar, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdul Nazer Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sangtarash N, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Activity of Chrysophyllum albidum Collected in Nsukka, South East Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniela Rigano, University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

(2) Dr. Marcello Iriti, Professor, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Uday Raj Sharma, Acharya & BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Martina Kurnia Rohmah, Anwar Medika University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abid Mehmood, The University of Haripur, Pakistan.

(2) Deepti Tomar, Govt. Degree College Nainpur, India.

(3) Martina Kurnia Rohmah, Anwar Medika University, Indonesia.

(4) Marízia Clara de Menezes Dias Pereira, University of Évora, Portugal.

(5) Beack Bayengue Sandrine Suzanne, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Uday Raj Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Martina Kurnia Rohmah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Insulin Mediated Lipohypertrophy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Engbang Ndamba Jean Paul, Lecturer, University of Douala, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Kadir Dotun M, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(2) Yasir Al-Mawlah, DNA Research Center, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Helen Bassey Akpan, Pamo University of Medical Sciences, Nigeria.

(2) Wan Nazatul Shima Shahidan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Eduardo Lorenzo Perez-Campos, The National Technological Institute of Mexico, Mexico.

(4) Tahrir Etihad Kadium, Alkindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hanan Alsaeid Alshenawy, Tanta University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kadir Dotun M, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yasir Al-Mawlah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Using the Talk Box to Improve Early Children’s Communication Ability

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Por Fei Ping, School of Education, Wawasan Open University, Malaysia.

(2) Omer Elsheikh Hago Elmahdi, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Arun Daves, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Tarjani Sheth, Uka Tarsadia University, India.

(3) Sabina Zejnelagic, State University of Novi Pazar, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Por Fei Ping, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Omer Elsheikh Hago Elmahdi, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Economic Analysis on Marketing and Brand Awareness of Rifit Plus (Herbicide) in Ghazipur District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharmendra Shanabhai Mistry, Prin M C Shah Commerce College, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Kiril Stefanov Slaveykov, Trakia University, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Johnson Oluyemi Ojosu, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dharmendra Shanabhai Mistry, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kiril Stefanov Slaveykov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Protein C and Measurement of Coagulation Changes among Sudanese Patients with Solid Malignancy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alberto Olaya Vargas, Professor, National Institute of Pediatric, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Qusay Kh. Al-Dulamey, Mosul University, College of Science, Iraq.

(2) Meera Sikka, University of Delhi, India.

(3) Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anu Anna Jacob, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Kosasih, Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia.

(3) Basil A. Abbas, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(4) Karuna Dasari Subramanyam, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, India.

(5) Lata.  Mullur, BLDE(DU), India.

(6) Vijayalakshmi S, The TN Dr MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Qusay Kh. Al-Dulamey, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Meera Sikka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Potentials of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) as Raw Material for Biofertilizer

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, School of Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) Ana Carla Coleone de Carvalho, São Paulo State University, UNESP, FCAV, Brazil.

(2) Taghreed  El Sayed Eissa, Horticulture Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anita Pande, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

(2) Refaz Ahmad, Govt Degree College for Women Anantnag, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ana Carla Coleone de Carvalho, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Taghreed El Sayed Eissa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA