Peer Review History: Effects of a Herbal Sex Enhancer (Vigpower) and Zinc Supplementation on Sex Hormones, Hepatic and Renal Function in Male Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunying Li, Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed TM Elshennawy, Al-Baha University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Simson Soren, Lakhimpur College of Veterinary Science, AAU, India.

(3) Ali M. Kadim Al-Tuma, Kerbala University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahmed TM Elshennawy, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Simson Soren, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ali M. Kadim Al-Tuma, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Caesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: Knowledge and Perception of Pregnant Women from Southern Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eghon Guzman B, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Santiago, Chile.

Reviewers:

(1) Kavitha Bakshi, Mamata Medical College, India.

(2) Ochima Onazi, Federal Medical Centre, Nigeria.

(3) Azza Abdalsemia Elewa, Helwan University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hosni Khouadja, Faraht Hached Teaching Hospital, Tunisia.

(2) Yosria EL-Sayed Hossein, Minia University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Binay K Biswas, ESIC Medical College Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kavitha Bakshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ochima Onazi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Azza Abdalsemia Elewa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climbers of Rourkela Forest Division, Odisha, India: Food, Medicinal, Ecological and Economical Aspects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Prathyusha Engineering College, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tena Regasa Duresa, Wallaga University, Ethiopia.

(2) Muna Sameer Saeed Al-Rawi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shankar, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tena Regasa Duresa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muna Sameer Saeed Al-Rawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Income Analysis of Tuna Fish Meatball Business (Case Study at CV Olahan Berkah Sadayana in Karangpawitan District, Garut Regency)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jorge Castro Mejia, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Xochimilco, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) J Michael Antony Prabhu Arachi, Periyar Arts College, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Radu Daniela, Fish Culture Research and Development Station, Romania.

(3) Minati Rani Mohapatra, India.

(4) Zugravu Consatanta Laura, University “Dunarea de Jos” of Galati, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (J Michael Antony Prabhu Arachi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Radu Daniela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Minati Rani Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Zugravu Consatanta Laura, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2| File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integration of TOPSIS and Geostatistical Technique for Soil Quality Assessment under Different Land Uses: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Associate Professor, Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Lucrêncio Silvestre Macarringue, Instituto Politécnico de Ciências da Terra e Ambiente, Mozambique.

(2) Tarek Abdel Wahab Ali El Barbary, Central Metallurgical Research and Development Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lucrêncio Silvestre Macarringue, Mozambique) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tarek Abdel Wahab Ali El Barbary, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Village Adoption Programme: A Benchmark Survey Report of Damera Village

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) H. Chandrashekar, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Yingji Li, School of Humanities and Management, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jajnaseni Rout, Ravenshaw University, India.

(2) Pooja Kumari, KVK Darbhanga, DRPCAU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Surabhi Singh, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (H. Chandrashekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yingji Li, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Auxins in Haploid Embryo Induction in Hexaploidy Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Prince Emmanuel Norman, Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute, Sierra Leone.

(2) Md. Shahadat Hossen, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Codruța Mihaela Dobrescu, University of Pitești, Romania.

(2) João Rufino de Freitas Filho, Rural Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

(3) Nitale M’Balikine Krou, University of Kara, Togo.

(4) Nyimas Popi Indriani, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.

(5) Rasha Nagy Arafa, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prince Emmanuel Norman, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Md. Shahadat Hossen, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Contributing to Obesity among Adolescents

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Karl Kingsley, Professor, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Dental Medicine, USA.

(2) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Marina Layara Sindeaux Benevides, Unifametro, Brazil.

(2) Majid Mohammed Mahmood, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(3) Valdemir José Alegre Salles, University of Taubaté, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jocelyn B. Hipona, Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines.

(2) Khadije Ezzati Rastegar, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marina Layara Sindeaux Benevides, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Majid Mohammed Mahmood, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Valdemir José Alegre Salles, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pattern of Liver Function Test in Scrub Typhus Cases: A Hospital Based Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Center in Nepal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nemat Khansari, Gandhi General Hotel Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Jonathan Soldera, University of South Wales, United Kingdom.

(2) Sileshi Berihun Delele, Injibara University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bratko Filipič, Slovenia.

(2) Vibha Sushilendu, ESICMCH, India.

(3) Ileimokumo E. Ogregade, Bayelsa Medical University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) S. Jayakumari, Vels Insitute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(2) Davi Félix Martins Junior, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana – UEFS, Brazil.

(3) Amipara, GTU, India.

(4) Ravindra Kumar Sah, Arya Care and Cure Private Limited, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jonathan Soldera, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sileshi Berihun Delele, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Does Organic Farming Ensure Food Security? An Analysis of Developing Countries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Varsha Rani, Assistant Professor, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniela Cirnatu, Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad, Romania.

(2) Amal Mohamed Kamal El Safty, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jajnaseni Rout, Ravenshaw University, India.

(2) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(3) Purabi Kaushik, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(4) Robinson Mose Ocharo, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) C.L. Avadhani, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Santosh Kumar Samantaray, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Daniela Cirnatu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amal Mohamed Kamal El Safty, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA