Peer Review History: The Impact of Digital Finance on Import and Export Trade in 31 Provinces in China: A PVAR Model Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria-Dolores Guillamon, Associate Professor, University of Murcia, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Elvis Munyaradzi Ganyaupfu, University of South Africa, South Africa.

(2) Mariah Binti Darus  Mat Junus, School of Government, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jerry Chukwuebuka Orajekwe, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Naresh Sachdev, PCTE Group of Institutes Ludhiana, India.

(3) Onime, Bright Enalhe, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elvis Munyaradzi Ganyaupfu, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mariah Binti Darus Mat Junus, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Evaluation of Anticancer Activity of the Methanolic and Aqueous Extracts of the Petals of C. tinctorius L. (Safflower Florets)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Professor, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, IUT, Iran.

(2) Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq.

(3) Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Mohstansaryah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naeem Hasan Khan, AIMST University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Samir Kumar Pal, India.

(2) Daniel Omokpariola, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical and Epidemiological Aspectsin Indigenous Elderly People with Tuberculosis in a State in the Brazilian Amazon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ender Durualp, Associate Professor, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Leili Mohammadi, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Stanley .C. Nwasuka, Clifford University, Nigeria.

(3) Valdomiro Vagner de Souza, University Center of Itajubá, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Vas de Braganca, Goa University, India.

(2) Iroma Maulida, Polytechnic Harapan Bersama, Indonesia.

(3) Lubna Khatoon, International College Copenhagen, Denmark.

(4) Tania Bulbul, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Leili Mohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Stanley .C. Nwasuka, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Valdomiro Vagner de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Insight the Quality Parameters of Diverse Rice Germplasm Set of Chhattisgarh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejeswara Rao Voonna, MVR College, India.

(2) Josie Naomi Iyeyasu, State University of Campinas, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hernawati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Indonesia.

(2) Joko Prasetyo, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tejeswara Rao Voonna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Josie Naomi Iyeyasu, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Valsalva Manoeuvre: A Versatile Diagnostic and Therapeutic Method

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Joao Paulo Schwartz, Araraquara Dental School, Paulista State University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghada Abd Alrhman Taqa, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Sávio Morato de Lacerda Gontijo, Centro Universitário Una, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tahrir N. Aldelaimi, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ghada Abd Alrhman Taqa, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sávio Morato de Lacerda Gontijo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Anthropogenic Factors on Reforestation Activities in the Ecosystems of the Teaching and Research Forest (FER) of the National School of Water and Forests (ENEF) Mbalmayo in Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nebi Bilir, Professor, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Edda Brenda S. Yerro, University of San Agustin, Philippines.

(2) Prency D. Yerro, West Visayas State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Edda Brenda S. Yerro, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prency D. Yerro, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Corporate Board Diversity Effect on Environmental Sustainability Disclosure Evidence from Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Adina Dornean, Associate Professor, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mini Agrawal, Amity Business School, Amity University, India.

(2) Ch. V. Rama Krishna Rao, RISE Krishna Sai Prakasam Group of Institutions, India.

(3) Mohammad Ahmad Abu Zraiq, University Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elisha, Otekenari David, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) G. Bhaskar, ANR College of Arts and Science, India.

(3) Gyanendra Prasad Paudel, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(4) Leelawati, St. Andrews Institute of Technology and Management, India.

(5) Maria José da Silva Faria, Lusíada University and Maia University, Portugal.

(6) Mazrah Malek, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

(7) Moustafa Sobhy Mahmoud Abo El Nile, October 6 University, Egypt.

(8) Posma Sariguna Johnson Kennedy, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia.

(9) Widayat, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia.

(10) Minati Rani Mohapatra, DEPWD, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tatiq Mahmood, Pakistan.

(2) Yan Alice Xie, University of Michigan-Dearborn, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mini Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ch. V. Rama Krishna Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mohammad Ahmad Abu Zraiq, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Interaction Effect of Operating Parameters of Blade on Vermicompost Quality under Drum Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Gabriel Gomes de Oliveira, UNICAMP, FEEC, Brazil.

(2) Madhu Palati, BMS Institute of Technology and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pribadyo, Teuku Umar University, Indonesia.

(2) Ali Fadhil Naser, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Idrees Kocher, Duhok Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(2) Hind Z. Khaleel, University of Technology, Iraq.

(3) Pratibha S. Kurup, Bharti University Durg Chhatisgarh, India.

(4) Yasir Zulfiqar, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Science, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gabriel Gomes de Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Madhu Palati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Smart Aquaponics System for Oreochromis niloticus Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. José Alberto Duarte Moller, Center for Advanced Materials Research, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

(2) Mohammad Reza Hedayati, Iran Telecommunication Research Center, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Debasis Gountia, Odisha University of Technology and Research, India.

(2) Noura Ahmed Mawla, Al-Rafidain University College, Iraq.

(3) Shruti Aggarwal, Chandigarh University, India.

(4) Magesh Kasthuri, India.

(5) S. Venkatesh Babu, SNS College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jia Qu, Hebei Petroleum University of Technology, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manu Mitra, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Reza Hedayati, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Postharvest Impact of Different Sugar Levels on Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus undatus) Candy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharmendra Shanabhai Mistry, Prin M C Shah Commerce College, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Uadal Singh, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marina Abdul Manaf, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Eman Ibrahim El-Sayed Abdel-Wahab, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, University of Hindu Indonesia, Indonesia.

(4) Henrilyn E. Loñez, Kalinga State University, Philippines.

(5) Hisworo Ramdani, IPB University & Trilogi University, Indonesia.

(6) Moh. Su’I, Widyagama University of Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Silvia C. S. R. de Moura, Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dharmendra Shanabhai Mistry, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Uadal Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA