Peer Review History: An Unusual Clinical Manifestation of a Rare-Site Duodenal Perforation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajat Choudhari, SMS Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Kewithinwangbo Newme, AIIMS, India.

(3) Sudhansu Ranjan Swain, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Maria Dascalu, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Adil Pervaiz Shah, Kahmir University, India.

(3) Sunny Doodu Mante, Ghana.

(4) Timothy R. Koch, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, United States.

(5) Terlika Pandit Sood, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rajat Choudhari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kewithinwangbo Newme, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sudhansu Ranjan Swain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Visualized Treatment Objective and Post-Treatment Outcome in Skeletal Class II Functional Cases: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Izaz Shaik, Associate Dentist, Lakewood Family Dental IL, United States.

Reviewers:

(1) Basser Ali Abdullah, University of Mosul, College of Dentistry, Iraq.

(2) Tarun Kumar Singh, All India Institute of Medical Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hema Kanathila, Kaher KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, India.

(2) Jay Kansara, India.

(3) S. P. Indra Kumar, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, India.

(4) Esshagh Lasemi, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(5) Nithya, S, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, India.

(6) Wan Muhamad Amir Bin W Ahmad, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(7) Ziad H. Deleme, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Basser Ali Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tarun Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Citizens Education Learning Model Based on Rejecting Local Wisdom to Improve Student Social Behavior

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalpak Chaudhuri, Gedu College of Business Studies, Royal University of Bhutan, India.

(2) Ady Ferdian Noor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dalia Perkumienė, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania.

(2) Gentjana Taraj, ‘Aleksander Moisiu’ University, Albania.

(3) Lok Raj Sharma, Nepal.

(4) Marta Lacková, University of Žilina, Slovakia.

(5) Otaiza Cupare Castro, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Venezuela.

(6) Samah Khaled Zahran, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

(7) V. A. Jyothi, India.

(8) Yulia, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

(9) Zahra Arefnejad, Ir. of Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Venkat Lakshmi H, Smt. VHD Central Institute of Home Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kalpak Chaudhuri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ady Ferdian Noor, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Innovation Piracy in Online Entertainment Media in Indonesia: Determinants of Individual Planned Behavior

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Yves Ekoué Amaïzo, Austria.

(2) Aloke Sarkar, Institution of Engineers, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vijay Kumar Bharati, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yves Ekoué Amaïzo, Austria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aloke Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formula of Mustard (Brassica juncea L) Stick Fortified Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) M.R. Suchitra, Sastra University, India.

(2) Udayasika Piyasiri, Australia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. R. Suchitra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Udayasika Piyasiri, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Metagenomic Profile of Bacteria Strains Present in an Abandoned Artisanal Refinery Site, in Obi-Ayagha Community, Delta State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Manal Moustafa, Cairo University, Giza 12211, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Chiti Agarwal, University of Maryland, USA.

(2) Nancy Sheoran, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manosha Perera, Griffith University (Alumnus), Australia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Chiti Agarwal, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nancy Sheoran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Purple Segmented Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) Genotypes for Growth and Yield Contributing Characters under Coimbatore Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Ravindra Kumar Agarwal, Centre for Health and Applied Sciences, Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cristina B. Colloca, Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego (UNTDF), Argentina.

(2) Pratibha S. Kurup, Bharti University Durg Chhatisgarh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alaa Mohammed Mohammed El – Shoura, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science (Patliputra University), India.

(3) Nejjar El Ansari Zineb, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

(4) W U L Ambagaspitiya, Sri Lanka.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ravindra Kumar Agarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Economic Analysis of Cost of Production of Black Pepper in Wayanad District of Kerala in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Professor, Sun Yat-Sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Amose, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Al Faya Alhassan, KKU, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Yan Yunxian, College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prabhakar Sastri, Welcomgroup Scholl of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Salisu Audu Baba, College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. Amose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Al Faya Alhassan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Yan Yunxian, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization of Recycled Fiber Material Made from Liquid Containerboard (LCB) and/or Old Corrugated Containers (OCC) – Evaluation of its Use by a Handsheet Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Madogni Vianou Irenee, Laboratoire de Physique du Rayonnement LPR, Cotonou, Universite d’Abomey-Calavi (UAC), Benin.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Javier Cruz Gómez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

(2) E. Kavitha, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deacha Chatsiriwech, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Javier Cruz Gómez, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (E. Kavitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: “Innovative Shroud” – A New Possibility for Production of Clean Steel in Tundish

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, Professor, School of Mines, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Farnush, School of Metallurgy & Materials Eng., University of Tehran, Iran.

(2) Mohammad Asadi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Ankit Bhojani, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wenjie Yuan, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ocheri C., University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammad Farnush, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Asadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ankit Bhojani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA