Peer Review History: Ultrasound Assisted Hybrid Technologies for Extraction of Bioactive Compounds

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Burcu Ayhan Sahin, Istanbul Kultur University, Turkiye.

(2) Akash Kusum Maiti, Thangal Kunju Musaliar Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Kuldeep Singh, Laxminarayan Innovation Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B V V Balaram Bhagath, Godavari Global University, India.

(2) Dorna Abdolkhani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Mohamed Rashad Gouda Youssif, Egypt.

(4) Shakila Banu, India.

(5) Susi Desminarti, Agricultural Polytechnic State Payakumbuh, Indobesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Burcu Ayhan Sahin, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akash Kusum Maiti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kuldeep Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Behavioral Insights into Farmers Adoption of Improved Rapeseed-mustard Cultivation Practices in North Bank Plain Zone of Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Rajaguru, Gandhigram Rural Institute, India.

(2) Abdul Hadi Wasil, Afghanistan National Agricultural Sciences and Technology University, Afghanistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Binoy Tripura, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) C.Narayanaswamy, UAS, Bangalore, India.

(3) Rsshmi Rekha Kalita, Rupahi College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Rajaguru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Hadi Wasil, Afghanistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Technology Change in Hybrid Tomato Production: A Field Based Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Sarvade, JNKVV, India.

(2) Dickson Utonga, Tengeru Institute of Community Development, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Boucherit Hafidha, University Center of Naama, Algeria.

(2) Praveen Kumar, Sri Eshwar Colllege of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Sarvade, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dickson Utonga, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Market Profile Analysis of Medicinal Plant Products Trade in Margibi County, Liberia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Al Madinah International University, Malaysia.

(2) Abhishek Konar, School of Lifesciences, Seacom Skills University, India.

(3) Laxmi Kant Pandey, St. Aloysius College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Linsheng Cheng, Anshun University, P. R. China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Konar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Laxmi Kant Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Parenteral Nutrition in the Health-Care Setting: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R. Deveswaran, Associate Professor & Head, Drug Design and Development Centre, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhamshu Kalasapura Chandrashekhar, Jss Academy of Higher Education and Research, India.

(2) Sajid Rashid, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan.

(3) Hilal N I, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhamshu Kalasapura Chandrashekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajid Rashid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hilal N I, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integration of Renewable Energy for Power Transfer Improvement of the Nigerian 330KV Transmission Network

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Assistant Professor, School of Electrical and Communication Sciences, B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saif Ali Kadhim, University of Technology, Iraq.

(2) Saifee Kanjetawala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) France O. AKPOJEDJE, Nigeria.

(2) Guentri Hocine, University center Nour Bachir El bayadh, Algeria.

(3) Prakash Gajanan Burade, Soet-Sandip University Nashik, India.

(4) Rudresh B. Magadum, VTU, Belagavi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saif Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saifee Kanjetawala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Wind Energy Potential for Small-scale Turbine Deployment at Akwa Ibom State University Community, Ikot Akpaden, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Assistant Professor, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Asish Kumar Akash, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) Neeraj Kumar, Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asish Kumar Akash, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neeraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of an Indoor Line Scanning System for Photovoltaic Modules Performance Characterization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Research Scientist, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Praveen Galphade, B. K. Birla college of Arts, Commerce and Science (Autonomous), India.

(2) Mohammed Qasim Taha, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akram Al-Khazzar, Iraq.

(2) Ashok Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University Sabour, India.

(3) Issa Faye, Assane Seck University, Senegal.

(4)  Juma Tsuma Mwembe, Multimedia University of Kenya, Kenya.

(5) Khin Moe Moe, Yangon Technological University, Myanmar.

(6) T.Sundar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

(7) Wilkins K Cheruiyot, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashmi Praveen Galphade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Qasim Taha, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing Export of Soya Bean Oil from India: A Panel Gravity Model Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sachin Rathour, BHU, India.

(2) Poonam Chaturvedi, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Kumar Rai, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sachin Rathour, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poonam Chaturvedi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of High-Density Planting Configurations for Poovan Banana (Musa spp.) in Coconut-Based Agroforestry Systems of the Cauvery Delta Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Meriame Laita, University Ibn Toufail, Morocco.

(2) Ghodake Balkrushna Dattatray, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meriame Laita, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghodake Balkrushna Dattatray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA