Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. A. Elbagermi, Misurata University, Libya.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Usmeldi, State University of Padang, Indonesia.

(2) Venkat Lakshmi H, Smt. VHD. Central Institute of Home Science, India.

(3) Rhonda Dookwah, University of the Commonwealth Caribbean, Trinidad and Tobago.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chrisafe Cyril N. Daga, Leyte Normal University, Philippines.

(2) Eduardo Mario Lacues Apud, Catholic University of Uruguay, Uruguay.

(3) Rossella Marisi, Italy.

(4) Zahra Arefnejad, Parvin Etesami Trustee High School, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Usmeldi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Venkat Lakshmi H, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rhonda Dookwah, Trinidad and Tobago) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Raj Singh, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Nor Zuriati Amani Binti Ab Rani, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Northern Technical  University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Prince Emmanuel Norman, Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SLARI), Sierra Leone.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raj Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nor Zuriati Amani Binti Ab Rani, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yalçın Coşkun, Associate Professor, Lapseki Vocational College, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Taoufik Mohamed, Regional Center for Education and Training, Morocco.

(2) Hussin Jose Hejase, Al Maaref University, Lebanon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Imene Djelloul, Ecole Supérieure Des Sciences Appliquées D’Alger, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Taoufik Mohamed, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hussin Jose Hejase, Lebanon) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Champa Lal Khatik, Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research Station, Fatehpur, Sikar, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Rajasthan, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Maria José Silva, ISA, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Université Antananarivo, Madagascar.

(2) Khaled khanchouch, University of Tunis, Tunisia.

(3) Walaa Abdel-kader Ramadan Ibrahim, Biotechnology Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, Patliputra University, Patna.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Yuvaraj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria José Silva, Portugal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

(2) Olifir Yurii, Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anang Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Olifir Yurii, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, Professor, School of Mines, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Dileep M R, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Ali Anvari, University of Missouri, Columbia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pierfrancesco Morganti, Academy of History of Healthcare Art, Italy.

(2) Sarbjeet Kaushal, Gulzar Group of Institutions, India.

(3) Sugeng Hadi Susilo, Politeknik Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Carlos Frajuca, Brazil.

(2) Margarita Rivera, Physics Institute, Autonomous National University of Mexico, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dileep M R, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ali Anvari, Columbia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Assistance Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Yousef Farhaoui, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco.

(2) Mehdi Rostamizadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vinu Choudhary, Bisu Hospital & Fertility Centre, India.

(2) Sanjeev V Jakati, Sankalchand Patel University Visnagar, India.

(3) Sreelatha S, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yousef Farhaoui, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mehdi Rostamizadeh, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Aba-Toumnou lucie, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

(2) Maryam Afrousheh, Pistachio Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elena Nikolova-Kostadinova, Bulgarische Schule “Vasil Levski” in Saarbrücken and Kaiserslautern, Deutschland.

(2) Barlin Orlando Olivares, University of Cordoba, Spain.

(3) Felix Mereka Chipojola, Malawi.

(4) Hari Om, BAU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rusănescu Carmen Otilia, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) P. Shanthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aba-Toumnou lucie, Central African Republic) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maryam Afrousheh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) S.T. Janetius, India.

(2) Dennis G. Caballes, The National Teachers College, Philippines.

(3) Sonja Šare, University of Zadar, Medical School Ante Kuzmanića Zadar, Croatia.

(4) Maxwell Rani, Centre for Theatre and Dance, Performance Studies, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) ST. Lokeswara Rao, GIET University, India.

(2) Sruthi Nair, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S.T. Janetius, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dennis G. Caballes, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sonja Šare, Croatia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Maxwell Rani, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Xingjun LI, Academy of State Administration of Grains, China.

(2) Hin Lyhour, Royal University of Agriculture, Cambodia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Xingjun LI, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hin Lyhour, Cambodia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA