Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Category Archives: Review History
Peer Review History: Concentration and Diversification of Crops in Ambedkar Nagar District of Uttar Pradesh, India
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Xu Chong, Professor, National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of China, China.
Reviewers:
(1) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, University of Hindu Indonesia, Indonesia.
(2) Miguel Armando López Beltrán, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, México.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Miguel Armando López Beltrán, México) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Analyzing the School Principal’s Role in Teacher Professional Development
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.
Reviewers:
(1) T S Arulananth, JNTUH, India.
(2) Theingi Maung Maung, AIMST University, Malaysia.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Minati Rani Mohapatra, Composite Regional Centre, India.
(2) Yogesh Wasudeo Bhowte, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
(1) Shah Murtaza Rashid Al Masud, University of Asia Pacific, Bangladesh.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T S Arulananth, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Theingi Maung Maung, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Market Potential of Selected Agricultural Products and Problems Identification of Groundnut Cultivation in Bhankhokhari Market of Devbhoomi Dwarka District, Gujarat, India
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.
Reviewers:
(1) Biaou Chabi Felix, University of Abomey, Benin.
(2) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, College of Horticulture & Forestry, Central Agricultural University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Biaou Chabi Felix, Benin) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Core Skills and Competencies Essential for Agricultural Extension Workers to Meet Present Day Challenges
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.
Reviewers:
(1) Abdisa Abe Neme, Madda Walabu University, Ethiopia.
(2) Vipan Kumar Rampal, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Punjab Agricultural University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Abadi Teklehaimanot, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
(1) Rajeshkumar M. Bhuva, Navsari Agricultural University, India.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdisa Abe Neme, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vipan Kumar Rampal, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Issues and Challenges Faced by Small and Marginal Farmers during COVID-19 Pandemic
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.
Reviewers:
(1) Prashant Shrivastava, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, India.
(2) Shahram Gilaninia, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
(3) Alok Kumar Yadav, CCS-National Institute of Animal Health, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Pia Ghoshal, St. Xavier’s College, India.
(2) Chanate Ratanaubol, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.
(3) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.
(4) Onwubiko Emmanuel Chidiadi, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Nigeria.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prashant Shrivastava, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shahram Gilaninia, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Alok Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Effect of Different Planting Methods and Spacing on Growth, Yield and Quality of Round Red Radish (Raphanus sativus) CV. Scarlet Globe
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Reviewers:
(1) Carmine Boniello, University of Salerno, Italy.
(2) S. Suresh, Sona College of Technology, India.
(3) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Tanta University, Egypt.
(2) Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Universidad Nacional de Concepción, Paraguay.
(3) Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Western University, Thailand.
(4) Zunuwanas Bin Mohamad, Politeknik Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Malaysia.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carmine Boniello, Italy) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Logistic Regression Based Cyber Harassment Identification
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Assistant Professor, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.
Reviewers:
(1) Prashant Dahiwale, Government Polytechnic, India.
(2) Jamal Kh-Madhloom, Wasit University, Iraq.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Prativa Rai, Sikkim Institute of Science & Technology, India.
(2) R. Nedunchelian, Anna University, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
(1) Harishchander Anandaram, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.
(2) Idrees Kocher, Duhok Polytechnic University, Iraq.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prashant Dahiwale, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jamal Kh-Madhloom, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Interactive Effect of Conservation Tillage, Potassium and Magnesium Sulphate Fertilization on Dry Matter Production, Physiological and Yield Parameters, and Yield of Grain Cowpea
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. C. S. Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.
(2) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.
Reviewers:
(1) Celal Cevher, Field Crops Central Researcher Institute, Turkey.
(2) Miguel Armando López Beltrán, Autonomous of Sinaloa University, México.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Alireza Allamah, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.
(2) I Nengah Muliarta, Warmadewa University, Indonesia.
(3) Niloofar Samadi, Azad University of Torbat-Jam, Iran.
(4) P. Praveena, Sahrdaya College of Engineering and Technology, India.
(5) R.Baskaran, Agni College of Technology, India.
(6) Rinku Moni Kalita, Bhattadev University, India.
(7) Seyyed Fazel Fazeli Kakhki, Khorasan Razavi Agriculture Research and Education Center, Iran.
(8) Zugravu Consatanta Laura, University “Dunarea de Jos” of Galati, Romania.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
(1) K. Ravikanth, India.
(2) Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana, ISCTE-IUL Lisbon University, Portugal.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Celal Cevher, Turkey) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Miguel Armando López Beltrán, México) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Ultimate Fate and Determination of Pyriproxyfen and Fenpropathrin in the Environment: A Critical Review
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.
Reviewers:
(1) B. Usharani, VISTAS, India.
(2) Satya Narayan Satapathy, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed To Be University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
(1) Jaime Thissen, United States.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (B. Usharani, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Satya Narayan Satapathy, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA