Peer Review History: Experimental Study of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Incorporating Micro Silica

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Prinya Chindaprasirt, Professor, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahmoud Owais, Assiut University, Egypt.

(2) Mohd Soyapi Bin Mohd Yusoff, Institute of Industry Revolution 4.0, The National University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) K. S. Johnsirani, Mailam Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdullahi Aliyu Alhaji, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Abdulrasool Thamer Abdulrasool Qandeel, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Iraq.

(3) Ashita Singh, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

(4) C.K.Gomathy, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

(5) Hajir A Al-Hussainy, Kerbalaa University, Iraq.

(6) Abdulrasool Thamer Abdulrasool Qandeel, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Iraq.

(7) P. Sangeetha, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hanan A. El Nouhy, Housing and Building National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Marzieh Mogholi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Mohd Syahrul Hisyam Bin Mohd Sani, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Pahang, Malaysia.

(4) Nuruddeen Muhammad Musa, Adustech, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mahmoud Owais, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohd Soyapi Bin Mohd Yusoff, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (K. S. Johnsirani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Safety of Aqueous Extract of Maize (Zea mays) Husks in Wistar Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Kasib Khan, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Meilinah Hidayat, Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Indonesia.

(2) Shazia Taj, Islamic International Medical College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Saritha, Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Meilinah Hidayat, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shazia Taj, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Principles of Four Basic Steps of Scientific Stage: Problem, Hypothesis, Trial, Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) KDV Prasad, Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International University, India.

(2) Chinwendu Uzuke, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gossan Djeke Pascal Gershom, Nangui Abrogoua University, Ivory Coast.

(2) T.Phani Madhavi, Indian Society for Technical Education, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Feno Daniel Rajaonasy, University of Toamasina, Madagascar.

(2) Akeel M. Kadim, College of Science, Al Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

(3) Poonam Mishra, Amity University Chhattisgarh, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (KDV Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chinwendu Uzuke, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Vehicular Pollution on Chlorophyll Content of Roadside Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, Professor, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Tsoata Esaie, University of Yaoundé 1, Cameroon.

(3) Tasneem Rangwala, Govt. Holkar Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Kumar Chachaiya, Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.36/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tsoata Esaie, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Tasneem Rangwala, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study of the Susceptibility of Candida Species Isolated from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infected Patients to Antifungal Drugs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zoran Todorovic, Professor, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade and University Medical Center “Bezanijska Kosa”, Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Antonio Neres Norberg, São Carlos Metropolitan School, Brazil.

(2) Susmit Sneha, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India.

(3) D. D.Moro, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arturo L Delgado, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

(2) Ehab Abdel Aziz Ahmed El-Shaarawy, Cairo University, Egypt.

(3) Sufia Zaman, Techno India University, India.

(4) Suzanne Reiter, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pravas Ranjan Sahoo, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Antonio Neres Norberg, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Susmit Sneha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (D. D.Moro, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rapid Assessment of Rind Hardness in Sugarcane and Its Association with Biochemical Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayushi Trivedi, RVSKVV, India.

(2) Yagya Dutta Dwivedi, Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Bomiraj, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Medani P. Bhandari, Akamai University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ayushi Trivedi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yagya Dutta Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physiological Parameters and Yield of Green Gram As Influenced By Weed Management Practices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) V Ramasubba Reddy, Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anil Batta, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

(3) Subia Jamil, Jinnah University for Women, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andrea G. Azuelo, Central Mindanao University, Philippines.

(2) Sheela Barla, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hiranmai Yadav R, Central University of Gujarat, India.

(2) Tran Van Minh, International University, Vietnam National University, Vietnam.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (V Ramasubba Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anil Batta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Subia Jamil, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Psychosocial Factors, Pro-Inflammatory Markers & Serum Lipids among Patients with Suicidal Ideation & Suicidal Attempts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Waqar Husain, COMSATS University, Pakistan.

(2) Zarina Zahari, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(3) Bernardo Ng, Sun Valley Research Center, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agung Riyanto Budi Santoso, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

(2) Amal Ibrahim Khalil, King Saud Bin Abdelaziz University for Health Sciences, College of Nursing, Egypt.

(3) Tariq Namad, Military Hospital Mohammed V Rabat, Morocco.

(4) Sukhmeet, Armed Forces Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Prakat Karki, Christ University, India.

(2) Pronab Ganguly, Australia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Waqar Husain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zarina Zahari, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Bernardo Ng, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Light Using on the Number of Giant Lift Net Catches in Barru District, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Najamuddin, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

(2) Rasha Ahmed Elsaid Shaheen, Fayoum University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J. Guillermo Galindo Reyes, Technological University of Escuinapa, Mexico.

(2) Jamaluddin, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(3) Naveen  Z, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

(4) Nisha Rana, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(5) Ondhoro Constantine Chobet, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gyaneswar Bhuyan, Vedic Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Najamuddin, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rasha Ahmed Elsaid Shaheen, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge of the Respondents towards Paddy Production Technology in Mahabubnagar District of Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman University, Turkey.

(2) Ghulam Abbas, Riphah International University, Riphah College of Veterinary Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nuradibah Mokhtar, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ismail Ukav, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ghulam Abbas, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA