Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leslaw Juszczak, Professor, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Gupta, I B S, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘Gr.T.Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(3) Zaied Omran Mosaa, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rasha Eldalawy, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(2) Rezza Ruzuqi, Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic of Sorong, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Giovanna Mosaico, Italy.

(2) Makkasau Plasay, Panakkukang College School of Health Sciences, Indonesia.

(3) Ninoska Margarita Paz Palacios, Universidad Bolivariana De Venezuela, Venezuela.

(4) S. Saradha, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education(CARE), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amit Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zaied Omran Mosaa, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Arunkumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Agricutural College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Marwa Adel Qotb Ibrahim, Soils, Water and Environmental Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Crammer Kaizzi Kayuki, National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Uganda.

(2) B. Laxmaiah, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Lucia Maria Jaeger De Carvalho, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (V. Arunkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marwa Adel Qotb Ibrahim, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) A. K. Sharma, SKRAU, India.

(2) Gamil Elsayed Ibrahim Ramadan, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Girish C. Kamble, SRRL Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Majid Sh. Hamdalla, Univ. of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (A. K. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gamil Elsayed Ibrahim Ramadan, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Girish C. Kamble, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Delian Elena, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Baraa Almansour, Syria.

(3) Sudaryanto, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Cruz Morillo Coronado, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Colombia.

(2) Devinder Pal Singh, Acoustics Research Center, Canada.

(3) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(4) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alexandre Ricardo Pereira Schuler, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brasil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Delian Elena, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Baraa Almansour, Syria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sudaryanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘Gr.T.Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Guan-Liang Chen, Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital, National Defence Medical Center, Taiwan.

(3) Shereen Rachel Varghese, Christian Medical College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enas Abdulsahib Badi, Iraq.

(2) Uzal Umar, Abubakar Tafawa  Balewa University, Nigeria.

(3) Anu Maharjan, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(4) Basiru Aliyu, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria.

(5) Ciza François, Burundi.

(6) Mehmet Sarıer, Istinye University, Turkey.

(7) Sónia Ferreira, University of Aveiro, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Guan-Liang Chen, Taiwan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shereen Rachel Varghese, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Professor, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Loganayagan, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Siti Baidurah, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Loganayagan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Siti Baidurah, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycon, Professor, School of Pharmacy, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Geeta Singh, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Abdullahi Bala Ado, Al-Qalam University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Addinul Yakin, Mataram University, Indonesia.

(2) Indrianty Sudirman, Indonesia.

(3) Kumala Deksisa, Jimma Universirty, Ethiopia.

(4) Rini Raharti, Janabadra University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Geeta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdullahi Bala Ado, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Petropoulos Spyridon, University of Thessaly, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Valliathal, Chikkaiah Naicker College, India.

(2) Uday Raj Sharma, Acharya, BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Valliathal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Uday Raj Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Amado A. Oliva, College of Arts and Sciences, Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges, Philippines.

(2) Thomas Mc Cloughlin, School of STEM Education, Innovation & Global Studies, Dublin City University, Ireland.

(3) Rajasekaran S, College of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Irena Nikaj, University Fan Noli, Albania.

(2) Adwan Mohammad Hasan Bani-Hamad, Emirates Schools Establishment, Jordan.

(3) Mahima Rai, IIS (deemed to be University), India.

(4) Ana Claudia Tenor, Municipal Secretary of Education of Botucatu São Paulo, Brazil.

(5) Anthony Wong Tik Tsuen, Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong.

(6) B. Keerthana, India.

(7) Everton Gomede, Canada.

(8) Gulzhaina K. Kassymova, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Kazakhstan.

(9) Savita Mishra, Vidyasagar College of Education, India.

(10) Slim Khiari, Tunisia.

(11) Thompson Mumuni, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Natalia Vronska, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia.

(3) Pramila Ramani, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amado A. Oliva, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Thomas Mc Cloughlin, Ireland) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rajasekaran S, Oman) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, Hengelo, The Netherland.

Reviewers:

(1) Swati Kurane, Bharati Vidyapeeth (deemed to be) University, College of Nursing, India.

(2) Durgaprasad Kamat, Sinhgad Academy of Engineering, SPPU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Swati Kurane, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Durgaprasad Kamat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2