Peer Review History: Production of Nungu Candy: An Experimental Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Amitava Chatterjee, India.

(2) S. Sankaravadivu, A. P. C. Mahalaxmi College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wojciech Piekoszewski, Jagiellonian University, Poland.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amitava Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Sankaravadivu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Direct Seeded Rice and Succeeding Lentil Crop under Integrated Nitrogen and Weed Management Practices in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Kerketta, India.

(2) Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Gamil elsayed Ibrahim Ramadan, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Maria Cristina de Souza, Federal University of Acre, Brazil.

(4) V. N. Kapadia, AAU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Kerketta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Promising Combination Systemic Fungicides in Combating Basal Stem Rot Disease of Coconut

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Aba-Toumnou Lucie, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

(2) Norida Mazlan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jaime Thissen, United States of America.

(2) Jonatan Carmen Rangel Nuñez, Universidad de Guanajuato, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aba-Toumnou Lucie, Central African Republic) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Norida Mazlan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Nitrogen Levels and Biofertilizers on the Growth and Yield of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186 México City, México.

Reviewers:

(1) M V Srirama Chandrasekharan, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Asaad Abdulwahed Bader Alasady, University of Duhok, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Tamilselvan, India.

(2) Dorcas T. Ezekiel–Adewoyin, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(3) D.Visagaperumal, T.John College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Hussein Ali Salim, Iraq.

(5) Ramiro Cruz Durán, Universidd Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pablo Huerta Fernández, La Molina National Agrarian University, Perú.

(2) P. Sampathkumar, Sastra Deemed University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M V Srirama Chandrasekharan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Asaad Abdulwahed Bader Alasady, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Galangal (Alpinia galanga L.) Rhizome for the Health of Cultured Fish

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Prathyusha Engineering College, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Doru Bănăduc, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.

(2) Daniel Cocan, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ida Lapadi, Papua University, Indonesia.

(2) Leandro Marques Correia, Universidade Federal do Cariri, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Doru Bănăduc, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Daniel Cocan, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Beneficial Approach of Management for Delayed Diagnosis of Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Associate Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dimitra Zafeiratou, University Hospital “Andreas Syggros”, Greece.

(2) Anil Gosavi, B.J. Govenament Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Ali Alshami, Sana’a University, Yemen.

(2) Shital Phuse, Sant Gadagebaba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Houshang Nemati, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Shristi Shrestha, Nepal Medical College, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dimitra Zafeiratou, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anil Gosavi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Accountability on Public Policy Implementation in Marsabit County Government

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Matthew Dayi Ogali, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Mesri Welhelmina Nisriani Manafe, Artha Wacana Christian University, Indonesia.

(3) Elena Cristiano, University of Calabria, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Kul Prasad Khanal, Kathmandu University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Matthew Dayi Ogali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mesri Welhelmina Nisriani Manafe, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Elena Cristiano, Italy) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Accountability and Quality of Service Delivery in Marsabit County Government

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria-Dolores Guillamon, Associate Professor, University of Murcia, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamad Joko Susilo, Islamic University of Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

(2) Jayesh Sudhakar Sarode, DBATU University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hishan S Sanil, University Technology Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Mohamed El Khouli, Sadat Academy for Management Science, Egypt.

(3) Olufemi Aladejebi, University of Lagos Business School, Nigeria.

(4) Tristiana Rijanti, Stikubank University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Albina Amin, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.

(2) Ebiziem, Jude Ebiziem, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohamad Joko Susilo, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jayesh Sudhakar Sarode, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Nano Potassium and Nano Zinc on Yield and Economic Enhancement on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D. Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce& Science College, India.

(2) Cardei Petru, The National Institute of Research – Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Devinder Pal Singh, Canada.

(2) Lalit M. Patil, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jayadipkumar Raghavbhai Talaviya, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) K Aruna Lakshmi, Reva University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aparna Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cardei Petru, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potential of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in Livestock Development: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Elena Konovalova, L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Russia.

(2) Patrick Wekondi Watete, Livestock Tarining Institute, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jalal Uddin Sarder, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

(2) Shaimaa Abed Saoud, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dibyendu Chakraborty, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

(2) D.Indira, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elena Konovalova, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Patrick Wekondi Watete, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA