Peer Review History: Indicators of Spousal Support for Good Pregnancy Outcome among Women Attending Antenatal Clinic at Adeoyo Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shankar Srinivasan, Professor, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mubashir Zafar, Ziahadan University, Pakistan.

(2) Sanjeev V Jakati, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.Anandhasayanam, TN DR. MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Mohseni Mahdieh Mehrab, Tehran University, Iran.

(3) Wiwat Rojanapithayakorn, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mubashir Zafar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sanjeev V Jakati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Scholastic Difficulty: Scale Development and Implications for Future Research

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Tahany Abdelhady Abdelrazek Kol, Al-Baha University, Egypt.

(2) Rajasekaran S, College of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) I Putu Andre Suhardiana, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, Indonesia.

(2) Low Jie Ying (Jesslynn), Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

(3) Supparang  Ruangvanich, Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tahany Abdelhady Abdelrazek Kol, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rajasekaran S, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Total Polyphenols, Total Flavonoids, Condensed Tannins, and Antioxidant Activity of Borassus aethiopum (Arecaceae) ripe fruits’ Peels, and Peel-Pulps, Dried at Different Temperatures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, Professor, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Maryland Parkway, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Patthraporn Siripipatthana, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(2) Pravin Madhukar Jawanjal, Gujarat Ayurved University, Bhargava Ayurveda College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mayur Pawshe, Wildlife Research and Training Centre, India.

(2) José Luis Corona Lisboa, University Pan American Center for Higher Studies, Colombia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Patthraporn Siripipatthana, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pravin Madhukar Jawanjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perception of Youth about Substance Abuse: The Case of Ghanaian Youth on Alcohol Usage

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Manuel Vargas-Canales, Professor, University of Guanajuato, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) A M Mahmud Chowdhury, Clarkson University, USA.

(2) Intekhabur Rahman, B. N. Mandal University, India.

(3) Lut Tamam, Cukurova University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adiele Ikenna Tonna, Clifford University, Nigeria.

(2) Ana Quenia Gomes Da Silva Allahdadi, Federal University of Bahia (Universidade Federal Da Bahia), Brazil

(3) Lim Seng Poh, Penang Matriculation College, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (A M Mahmud Chowdhury, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Intekhabur Rahman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Lut Tamam, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study to Assess the Prevalence of Non-suicidal Self Injury and Reasons for that Behaviour among Adults and their Coping

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Srijana Pandey, Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Nepal.

(2) Bhavana Purushottam Khobragade, RDIK and KD College, India.

(3) A M Mahmud Chowdhury, Clarkson University, USA.

(4) Aarthi, AIIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Srijana Pandey, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bhavana Purushottam Khobragade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (A M Mahmud Chowdhury, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Aarthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Summary of Research on Digital Twin Workshop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, Assistant Professor, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Bdour, Professor, The Hashemite University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Wang Yunxia, Nanjing Institute of Technology, China.

(2) Peng-Xiao Zhu, XCMG Research Institute, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Wang Yunxia, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Peng-Xiao Zhu, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physiochemistry and Microbiological Quality of Surface Water Body around Port Terminals in Southern Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Rauoof Ahmad Rather, SKUAST, India.

(2) Maryam Shamsi, University of Arak Medical Science, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rauoof Ahmad Rather, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maryam Shamsi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Bio Fertilizers and Phosphorus on Yield and Economics of Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrew Tapiwa Kugedera, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Anise Jorfi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Mohammed Ali Saad, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) José Nildo Tabosa, Brazil.

(3) Maral Etesami, Montana State University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Andrew Tapiwa Kugedera, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anise Jorfi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Microbial Inoculants for Green House Gases Mitigation under Irrigated Rice Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ricardo Gonzalez Mateos, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Mexico.

(2) Ihsan Flayyih Hasan AI-Jawhari, University of Thiqar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajinkya Pradeep Niphadkar, D Y Patil College of Architecture, India.

(2) Surabhi Yadav, Bipin Bihari College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ricardo Gonzalez Mateos, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ihsan Flayyih Hasan AI-Jawhari, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Statistical Analysis of Rainfall Pattern and Trend of Chhattisgarh State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakshi Aggarwal, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, India.

(2) Susan Ajiere, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Sucheta Singh, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akinyemi Clement Tomiwa, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria.

(2) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

(3) Kartikey Sahil, Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sakshi Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Susan Ajiere, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sucheta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA