Peer Review History: On-Farm Cocoa Fermentation Practices and their Effect on the Quality of Cocoa Beans in Three Agroecological Zones of Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tatjana Radosavljević, Institute of Pathophysiology, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Konan Kouakou Ahossi, Jean Lorougnon Guede University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(2) Dennis Owusu Boateng, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Telly Yarita Macías Zambrano, Instituto Superior Tecnológico Paulo Emilio Macías, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Konan Kouakou Ahossi, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dennis Owusu Boateng, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Farming Systems for Nutritional Food Security to Farm Families in Dry Land Farming Situation in Anantapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Auindrila Biswas, Jharkhand Rai University, India.

(2) Osuji Uchenna Theresa, Federal College of Land Resource Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Auindrila Biswas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osuji Uchenna Theresa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Curcumin on Cognitive Impairment in Aged Female Wistar Rats Subjected to Intestinal Ischemia-reperfusion Injury

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hakan Inci, Assistant Professor, Bingol University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gayatridevi Pushkar, Barkatullah University, India.

(2) Shweta Patel, Galgotias University, India.

(3) Alejandro Borrego-Ruiz, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gayatridevi Pushkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shweta Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alejandro Borrego-Ruiz, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritive Effects of Calcium Carbonate (caco3) on Selected Commercial Traits of Mulberry Silkworm (Bombyx mori L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Eugene A. Silow, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Assefa Tadesse, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Jassim Edan Qasim Al-musawi, Baghdad University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Assefa Tadesse, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jassim Edan Qasim Al-musawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Germination Dynamics of Crateva adansonii D.C. and Sarcocephalus latifolius (Smith) Buce: Key Forest Trees of Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mamta Khaiper, Om Sterling Global University, India.

(2) Tresa Hamalton, ICFRE-IWST, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) komal Shekhawat, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mhaiskar Priya Rajendra, Forest College and Research Institute, SKLTSHU, India.

(3) Samir Benamirouche, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mamta Khaiper, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tresa Hamalton, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Various Ameliorant Sources in Increasing NP Absorption and Sweet Corn Productivity on Sandy Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Khale Mohamed Abd El-Rheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Apahidean Alexandru, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khale Mohamed ABD El-Rheem, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khale Mohamed Abd El-Rheem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Apahidean Alexandru, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Plant Spacing and NPK Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Broccoli

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Champa Lal Khatik, Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research Station, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrutyunjay Padhiary, Assam University, India.

(2) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Technical Agricultural College, North Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Oyinlola Arike Ajayi, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrutyunjay Padhiary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Extraction and Characterization of Pectin from Ripe Mango (Mangifera indica) Peel

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, Ourense Campus, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Kumaresan, Vels Institutes of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(2) Hridyesh Pandey, College of Food Processing Technology and Bio-Energy, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Annammadevi G.S, GITAM School of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Eshak Mourad El-Hadidy, Food Technology Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Kumaresan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hridyesh Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation and Characterization of Naga King Chilli Rhizobacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Bahran Knfe Yakob, Rudn University, Eritrea.

(2) Nadeem Ahmed Ramadan, Al-Hadba University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bahran Knfe Yakob, Eritrea) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nadeem Ahmed Ramadan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vermicomposting and Its Role in Soil Health: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Mohan, Mahendra Engineering College, India.

(2) Vikash Kumar, BPSAC, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anusree Paul, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Masarrat Sultana, Shreeyash College Of Engineering And Technology, India.

(3) Niivedidhaa.B.S.R., Anand Institute Of Higher Technology, India.

(4) Raghvendra Kumar Kushwaha, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikash Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA