Peer Review History: Quantification and Diversity of Cultivated Bacteria in Root Endosphere and Rhizosphere of Bamboo Species Fargesia nitida in Association with the Tree Succession

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Alan Kelbis Oliveira Lima, University of Brasília, Brazil.

(2) Hafida Zahir, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, Morocco.

(3) Jayadipkumar Raghavbhai Talaviya, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. M. Khalequzzaman, Spices Research Centre, Bangladesh.

(2) Radoslaw Walkowiak, Poland.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alan Kelbis Oliveira Lima, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hafida Zahir, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jayadipkumar Raghavbhai Talaviya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Different Levels of Salicylic Acid on Growth Characteristics, Chlorophyll Content, Yield Attributes and Yield of Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.) under Rainfed Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Atef Mohamed Fathy Mohammed, Associate professor, Environment and Climate Change Research Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Eman Samy El-Hady, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Işilay Lavkor, Biological Control Research Institute, Turkey.

(3) Salam Thanoon Khaleel Alabar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kadri Karim, Regional Research Center in Oasis Agriculture, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eman Samy El-Hady, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Işilay Lavkor, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Salam Thanoon Khaleel Alabar, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chronic and Stubborn Leuco-melanoderma in a Child: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Fuyong Jiao, Prof and Head, Children’s Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (S P P H), Xi, an Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Hari Kishan Kumar Y, Raja Rajeswari Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) P S Suman Babu, RGUHS, India.

(3) Cesar Bimbi, Brazil.

(4) Johnson-Ajinwo, Okiemute Rosa, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G. Bhuvaneswari, Saveetha College of Nursing, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hari Kishan Kumar Y, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P S Suman Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Cesar Bimbi, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Johnson-Ajinwo, Okiemute Rosa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of New Generation Drugs by Enriching Them with Gases

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Pande Ayu Naya Kasih Permatananda, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia.

(2) Samir Mohamed Elrayes, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(3) Shogo Ozawa, Iwate Medical University, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ganesh Prasad Neupane, Medical University of Americas, Saint Kitts and Nevis.

(2) Isiaka Adio Hassan, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Majid Zolfagharikhorshaneh, Iran.

(4) Neelima Dhingra, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pande Ayu Naya Kasih Permatananda, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Samir Mohamed Elrayes, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shogo Ozawa, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Projection of Yield of Rice Crop over Prayagraj with Future Climatic Scenario

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vandana, Dashmesh Khalsa College, India.

(2) Madhav Narayan Shrestha, Asian Institute of Technology & Management, Nepal.

(3) Somanath Sarvade, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Majid Abdulhameed Ibrahim, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vandana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Madhav Narayan Shrestha, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Somanath Sarvade, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Feeding Locally Produced Soybean Meal and Fishmeal on the Performance of Broiler Chicks

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar Kashyap, Dau Shri Vashudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Oyekemi Olubamise Akinmusire, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(3) Mohamd Idris Alshelmani, University of Benghazi, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J. N. Ikpe, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Maduabuchi Inwele Amobi, Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria.

(4) Marwa A. Suliman, Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(5) Mohammed Ali Makki Jasim  AlRubaee, Wasit University, Iraq.

(6) Raafat Khidr, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Deepak Kumar Kashyap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Oyekemi Olubamise Akinmusire, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mohamd Idris Alshelmani, Libya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: “Change” and “Constant” in International Relations: A Case Study Based on the China-Bangladesh Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Associate Professor, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa Göktuğ Kaya, KTO Karatay University, Turkey.

(2) Mohammed Viquaruddin, USA.

(3) Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(4) Niyaz Panakaje, Srinivas University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agnaldo Keiti Higuchi, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Brazil.

(2) Dalvinder Singh Grewal, Desh Bhagat University, India.

(3) Fedaa Mohamed, Ahram Canadian University, Egypt.

(4) Irina-Ana Drobot, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, Romania.

(5) Norah Alsaeed, Jouf University, Saudi Arabia.

(6) Slim Chtioui, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mustafa Göktuğ Kaya, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammed Viquaruddin, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Niyaz Panakaje, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding Social Accountability at Rural Local Governance in Bangladesh and the Way Forward: In the Case of Union Parishad

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ridzwan Che Rus, Associate Professor, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Bălan Emanuel, Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania.

(2) Tanvir Ahmed, Foundation University, Pakistan.

(3) Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(4) Ngozi  C. Kamalu, Fayetteville State University, U.S.A.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Do Phu Hai, Hanoi University, Vietnam.

(2) Neha Bhushan, Amity University, India.

(3) Rajeev Singh Rana, S.G.R.R P.G College, India.

(4) Meena Ketan Sahu, Sambalpur University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bălan Emanuel, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tanvir Ahmed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Ngozi C. Kamalu, U.S.A) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Associated with Unmet Needs for Family Planning among People Living with HIV/AIDS in the South-South Region of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrea Toweka, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe.

(2) Nasir Mustafa, Istanbul Gelisim University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khola Waheed Khan, Wah Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Mathew David Ndomondo, Hubert Kairuki Memorial University, Tanzania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Andrea Toweka, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nasir Mustafa, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Some Promising Cotton Genotypes and Commercial Variety for Yield, Quality and Bacterial Blight Resistance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) George Timothy Opande, Kaimosi Friends University, Kenya.

(2) Rajwant Kaur, Chandigarh University, India.

(3) Naiknaware Vishal Vilasrao, Swa. Sawarkar College, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

(4) Gustavo Bich, National University of Misiones, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fabrício Tavares Cunha de Almeida, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

(2) F. Talat, AREEO, Iran.

(3) Manju Evelyn Bi, University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

(4) Naksheen Ardalan, Iraq.

(5) R. Anitha, Bharathi Women’s College, India.

(6) Wajiha Seerat, PMAS-ARID Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (George Timothy Opande, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rajwant Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Naiknaware Vishal Vilasrao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Gustavo Bich, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA