Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (Kap) on Covid-19 of Students of the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Kisangani

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bagiu Iulia-Cristina, Assistant Professor, Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Stefania Neiva Lavorato, Centro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Brazil.

(2) Jay L. Wenger, HACC, Central Pennsylvania’s Community College, USA.

(3) Riswani Tanjung, Sumatera Utara University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alaaeldeen Balal Ahmed, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

(2) Christulas Jyoti, Tata Main Hospital, India.

(3) Erika Palomares Resendiz, México.

(4) Hooshang Jafarizadeh, University of Ahvaz, Iran.

(5) A.Ranganadha Reddy, VFSTR Deemed to be University, India.

(6) Ravinder Yadav, Government Medical College and Hospital, India.

(7) Roman Stroganov, MSUMD, Russia.

(8) Rose Kokui Dufe Turkson, National University of Lesotho, Lesotho.

(9) Santoshi Ram Ghodake, SMBT Dental College and Hospital, India.

(10) Stan Florin Gheorghe, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(11) Walid Aly Hamed Abdelrahman Elamrousy, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Stefania Neiva Lavorato, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jay L. Wenger, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Riswani Tanjung, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of India towards Economic-Growth and Development of BRICS Member Countries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Josimar da Silva Freitas, Federal University of Amapá, Brazil.

(2) Tirso Javier Hernández Gracia, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Brij Behari Dave, Sardar Patel University, India.

(2) Chandra Shekhar Ghanta, Telangana University, India.

(3) Deepanjana Halder Majumder, Jadavpur University, India.

(4) Jatin Trivedi, National Institute of Securities Marnets, India.

(5) Shakuntla Sangam, India.

(6) S. Sundara Ram, MSME Development Institute Government of India, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Josimar da Silva Freitas, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tirso Javier Hernández Gracia, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Practices on the Use of Asthma Action Plans among Adult Asthmatic Patients Aged 18-65 in Nyamira, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Payala vijayalakshmi, Gitam Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Gitam University, India

Reviewers:

(1) Nitika Hans, Government Medical College, India.

(2) Patricia Haas, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

(3) Nagaraja Prasad Sai, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nitika Hans, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Patricia Haas, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nagaraja Prasad Sai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Peptic Ulcer Disease; Stomach and Gastric Ulcers, a Concise Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Associate Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yazachew Engida Yismaw, Bahir Dar University College of Medicine and Health Science, Ethiopia.

(2) Mikaela Clotilde da Silva, Federal University of Campina Grande, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Uday Kiran, Dr.Ysr Uhs, India.

(2) Nicola Basso, Un. Rome-Sapienza, Italy.

(3) Pattana Sripalakit, Naresuan University, Thailand.

(4) Alice Cheung, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yazachew Engida Yismaw, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mikaela Clotilde da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Drugs by Using Hyphenated Techniques and its Applications on Routine Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luca Grilli, Associate Professor, University of Foggia, Italy.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Navneet Kumar Verma, Buddha Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Deepa Srivastava, DDU Gorakhpur University, India.

(3) Lourdes Zumalacárregui de Cárdenas, Technological University of Havana, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Monika Laxman Jadhav, C. U. Shah College of Pharmacy, SNDT Women’s University, India.

(2) Rachana Bhimanwar, Dr. D Y Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Navneet Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Deepa Srivastava, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Lourdes Zumalacárregui de Cárdenas, Cuba) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ureteric Stenting and Percutaneous Nephrostomy Insertion for Acute Ureteric Obstruction: A Multi-centered Prospective Study to Compare the Quality of Life between both Procedures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rasha Ali Ahmed Abdelmowla, Assiut University, Egypt.

(2) Sujatha Siddappa, Institue of Nephrourology, India.

(3) Daisaku Hirano, Higashimatsuyama Municipal Hospital, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chima G Ofoha, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Cristian Persu, Carol Davila University, Romania.

(3) Mirela Gliga, Romania.

(4) Rasha Ali Ahmed Abdelmowla, Assiut University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rasha Ali Ahmed Abdelmowla, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sujatha Siddappa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Daisaku Hirano, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Analysis of GSTP1 ILE105VAL Polymorphism and Its Association with Gastric Cancer Susceptibility

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E. Umit Bagriacik, Gazi University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Cynthia Aracely Alvizo Baez, Professor, Laboratory Immunology and Virology, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasanta Kumar MItra, Sikkim Manipal University, India.

(2) Radhwan Nidal Al-Zidan, College of Pharmacy, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Fatemeh Kazemi-Lomedasht, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prasanta Kumar MItra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Radhwan Nidal Al-Zidan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Fatemeh Kazemi-Lomedasht, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Growth Parameters in Oats (Avena sativa L.) with Application of Nano Urea Fertilizer: A Field-based Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Horoias Roxana, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Taghreed  El sayed Eissa, Egypt.

(3) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Horoias Roxana, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Taghreed El Sayed Eissa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ali Hussein Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Heterotic Performance and Inbreeding Depression for Yield and Component Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em.Thell.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Feroze Hasan Rahman, Principal Scientist, ICAR – Agricutural Technology Application Research Institute Kolkata, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashutosh Kumar, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Ravindra Kumar Agarwal, Centre for Health and Applied Sciences, Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lydia Ndinelao Horn, University of Namibia, Namibia.

(2) Chandra Shekhar Singh, Dr. Rmlawadh University, India.

(3) Luciana Londe, Brazil.

(4) R.A. Gami, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

(5) R. Premsudha, TKR College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ashutosh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ravindra Kumar Agarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mapping Coffee Tree Fertilizer Requirements in Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, Professor, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

(2) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Associate Professor, Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Govindappa, Central Coffee Research Institute, India.

(2) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avdesh Bhardawaj, India.

(2) Hassan Kamil Jassim, Iraq.

(3) Indira Sarangthem, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural Chemistry, India.

(4) Isaac Sarfo, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China.

(5) Michele Ribeiro Ramos, University State Tocantins, Brazil.

(6) Paul Benyamin Timotiwu, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(7) Pratibha S.Kurup, Bharti University, India.

(8) James Peaches Phiri, Malawi.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Govindappa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA