Peer Review History: Effect of Organic Manures and Bio-fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus undatus L.) under Western Uttar Pradesh Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University,  Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhilan G, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, India.

(2) Dina Abdulsalam Saad, University of Diyala, Iraq.

(3) S.Uma, Ultra Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhilan G, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dina Abdulsalam Saad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.Uma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Anti Inflammatory and Anti-Oxidant Property of Ethanolic Extract of Dialium guineense Stem Bark in Ethanol-Induced Peptic Ulcer in Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajender Arutla, Satavahana University, India.

(2) Dhyanendra Singh Baghel, University, Sehore (M.P.), India.

(3) Prodip Roy, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajender Arutla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhyanendra Singh Baghel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prodip Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Ethical Leadership Behaviours on Teachers` Motivation in Primary Schools in Karagwe District, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Associate Professor, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Moses Muhindo Kibalirwandi, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda.

(2) Paul Andrew Bourne, Vocational Training Development Institute, Jamaica.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moses Muhindo Kibalirwandi, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Andrew Bourne, Jamaica) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leveraging Synthetic Data as a Tool to Combat Bias in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Model Training

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Tanta University, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Bharatish A, Assistant Professor, RV College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ijibadejo Oluwasegun William, ESCAE University, Benin Republic.

(2) Archana Balkrishna Yadav, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(3) Igor Molybog, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, United States of America.

(4) Asha Joseph, Nirmala College , Muvattupuzha, India.

(5) Taranpreet Singh Ruprah, Amity University Jaipur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ijibadejo Oluwasegun William, Benin Republic) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Archana Balkrishna Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Igor Molybog, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Asha Joseph, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Taranpreet Singh Ruprah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Parametric Modeling Method for Rapid Bridge Layout Using BIM Technology: A Revit and Excel Integration Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

(2) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jose Ignacio Avendano Bernal, University Polytechnic of Valencia, Spain.

(2) R. Shreedhar, Visvesvaraya Technological University, S.G. Balekundri Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jose Ignacio Avendano Bernal, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Shreedhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigating the Possibilities of Applying the TENS as a Neurostimulation Method

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Elnaz Abedini, Karabuk University, Türkiye.

(2) G. Janaki, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elnaz Abedini, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Janaki, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Granular Biostimulants on Growth and Yield Characteristics of Rice (Oryza Sativa) in New Alluvial Zone of West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Maryam Saffariha, UC Davis, USA.

(2) Hassan Hadi Alkarawi, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maryam Saffariha, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hassan Hadi Alkarawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Fresh Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss., 1830) Leaves and Kernels on the Mortality of the Sweet Potato Weevil (Cylas puncticollis Boheman, 1833) under Laboratory Conditions in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikhil Reddy K S, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, India.

(2) Maitreyee Roy, William Carey University, India.

(3) Asma Jabeen, Indian Institute of Rice Research, Osmania University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikhil Reddy K S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maitreyee Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Asma Jabeen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing Natural Arsenal for Effective Management of Jassid on Brinjal [Solenum melongena L.]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Hafiz Tanvir Ahmad, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(2) Krishna Raj, MES MK Mackar Pillay College for Advanced Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hafiz Tanvir Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of SSR Markers Linked to Mung Bean Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance in Blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) Using Bulked Segregant Analysis in F2:3 Population

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Miyazaki, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Velavan M, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Suresh K P, ICAR-NIVEDI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Velavan M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suresh K P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA