Peer Review History: Evaluation of Rice Varieties under Different Systems of Cultivation for Central Telangana Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Professor, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Gurjeet Singh, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Gandu Ranjith Kumar, ICAR-NAARM, India.

(3) A. Fahima Fathima, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benjapon Kunlanit, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(3) Majid Shaii Hamdalla, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gurjeet Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gandu Ranjith Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (A. Fahima Fathima, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Food Composition and Feeding Intensity of Channa Striata from Selected Stations of River Krishna, Andhra Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakpong Petkam, Assistant Professor, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) P.Naga Jyothi, Sri Venkateswara University, India.

(2) Kadhim Jawad Lafta Al-Zaidy, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S.P. Biswas, Dibrugarh University, India.

(2) Jesiel Mamedes Silva, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

(3) Saleem  Khalid Jebur, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (P.Naga Jyothi, India)) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kadhim Jawad Lafta Al-Zaidy, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Amendments and Inorganic Nutrient Management Approaches in Correcting Sodicity under Paddy Eco System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(2) Gayatree Goswami, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Doaa Abdel Rahman Mahmoud Hassanin, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gayatree Goswami, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of In-vivo Anticancer Activity Choerospondias axillaris in Swiss Albino Mice Models

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankur Singhal, Gs Ayurveda Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Shahla Jamal Shakkor, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dalia Mi Jamil, AL_ Nahrain University, Iraq.

(2) Ligia Rios Lopez, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Peru.

(3) Sonia Sharma, Khalsa College Amritsar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ankur Singhal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shahla Jamal Shakkor, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Antibiogram of Biofilm Forming Bacteria Associated with Toilet Seats in Dormitories within a University Campus in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lidija Kozacinski, Professor, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Bukola Margaret Popoola, Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria.

(2) Martin, Université d’Artois, France.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bukola Margaret Popoola, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Martin, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Zanthoxylum gilletii: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Amal Hegazi Ahmed Elrefaei, Division of Radioisotope Production, Hot Lab and Waste Management Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Durgaprasad Kemisetti, Assam Down Town University, India.

(2) Arun Kumar Ramu, Centre for Research and Development (CRD), PRIST Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Farhana Shafiq Ghory, Marine Reference Collection and Resource Centre, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Durgaprasad Kemisetti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arun Kumar Ramu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Farhana Shafiq Ghory, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Apocyclops royi (Cyclopoida, Copepoda) Nauplii as Live Prey for the First Feeding Larvae of Silver Pompano, Trachinotus blochii (Lacepède, 1801)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nese Yilmaz, Assistant Professor, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) André Luiz Veiga Conrado, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Anil Savji Kotiya, Fisheries Research & Training Center, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gajender Singh, India.

(2) Javan Ominde, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(3) Mukesh Kumar Bairwa, ICAR-Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (André Luiz Veiga Conrado, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anil Savji Kotiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Divergence Studies for Yield and Quality Traits in Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Huma Saleem, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

(3) Vikas Ramteke, S. G. College of Agriculture and Research Station, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ghada Mostafa Kattmah, General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research (GCSAR), Syria.

(2) Muhammad Zeeshan Mansha, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(3) Ram Ratan Singh, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(4) Sabin Fatima, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Huma Saleem, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 ((Vikas Ramteke, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics and Implications for Landscape Restoration in Cameroon’s Western Highlands

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Miaoli, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelkhalek Ibrahim Alastal, Islamic University, Palestine.

(2) Keerti Kulkarni, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdelkhalek Ibrahim Alastal, Palestine) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Keerti Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation and Phenotypic Characterization of Lytic Bacteriophage with Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zahid Anwar, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Alaaeldeen Balal Ahmed, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

(2) Rama Gupta, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alaaeldeen Balal Ahmed, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rama Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA