Peer Review History: Development and Ergonomic Assessment of Manually Operated Modified Linseed Crop Thresher

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1)  Er. Sunil Kumar, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Suhad Mathkoor Abdulsaheb Safi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1)  Dan Ioan Boariu, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Romania.

(2)  Eduardo Concepción Batiz, Brazil.

(3)  Hendrik, Indonesia.

(4)  Manish Kumar, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, India.

(5)  Rudy Hartono, Indonesia.

(6)  Tri Niswati Utami, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Er. Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Suhad Mathkoor Abdulsaheb Safi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tuberculosis of the Middle Ear: Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Associate Profressor, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA And Professor, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fazal I Wahid, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Said Ahmad Shah, Mie University, Japan.

(3) Sumit Mohan, Dental College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hari Shankar Sharma, MTMC, India.

(2) Jurandyr Santos Nogueira, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(3) Khaled Mohamed Bofares, Omar AL-Moukhtar University, Libya.

(4) Muhammad Ghafoor Ali, Pakistan.

(5) Nabin Lageju, Nepal Police Hospital , Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fazal I Wahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Said Ahmad Shah, Japan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sumit Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison-based Analysis of Epoxy Resin Using Core-shell Rubber

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Professor, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Seham S. Alterary, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Witold Brostow, University of North Texas, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Seham S. Alterary, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Witold Brostow, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Planting Time on Yield and Quality of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Kannan CS Warrier, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kannan CS Warrier, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Characterization (Electrical and Optical) of TiO2 Doped with MnO2

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K Bhowmik, Professor, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Baljeet Singh Saharan, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) N. L. Prasad, Bengaluru Central University, India.

(3) Odangowe Iinetiminebi Ogidi, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Baljeet Singh Saharan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (N. L. Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Odangowe Iinetiminebi Ogidi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reported Side-Effects of Using Skin-Lightening Products in Aden-Yemen: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Sharma, India.

(2) Mahaveer Mehta, Dr.Mahaveer Mehta Medical Center, United Arab Emirates.

(3) Ahmed Batea, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Abdulabbas Hasan Mohammed, Thi-Qar University, Iraq.

(2) Mutaz Sabah Ahmeid, Ibnsina University of Medical and pharmaceutical Science, Iraq.

(3) Pipat Chooto, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ravi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahaveer Mehta, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ahmed Batea, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Variations in Oxidative and Antioxidant Responses of Rice Plant to Arsenic Contaminated Areas of Assam

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Professor, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) R. S. Ernest Ravindran, KLEF, India.

(2) Sreemoy Kanti Das, Lincoln University College, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anup S Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University, India.

(2) Carlos Prosperi, Blas Pascal University, Argentina.

(3) El Amrani Souad, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco.

(4) Kavita Pravin Dukare, India.

(5) Santoshi R. Ghodake, SMBT Dental College and Hospital, India.

(6) Srividya Gullapudi, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

(7) Thais Pedrete, Florida State University, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (R. S. Ernest Ravindran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sreemoy Kanti Das, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Non Bio-degradable Plastic Eating Bacteria: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Xiao-Feng Sun, Associate Professor, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Benzhong Fu, Montana State University, U.S.A.

(2) Aleksandra Mikhailidi, St.-Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepti Chrungu, Panjab University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Benzhong Fu, U.S.A) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aleksandra Mikhailidi, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics of Castor Insect Pests in Relation to the Weather Parameters of Southern Telangana Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Professor, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) I Nengah Muliarta, Warmadewa University, Indonesia.

(2) Syed Arif Hussain Rizvi, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Gupta, Chandigarh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I Nengah Muliarta, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Syed Arif Hussain Rizvi, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tumor Recurrence of Breast Cancer Associated with Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Septic Shock: Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hab. Mariusz Cycon, Assistant Professor, School of Pharmacy with the Division of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

(2) Abeer M Shawky, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adrian P. Hunis, Argentina.

(2) Ebru Derici Eker, Mersin University Health Science Institute, Turkey.

(3) Fanny Margaretha Laihad, Hang Tuah University Surabaya, Indonesia.

(4) Lea Paola Fabbri, Italy.

(5) Shailendra Kumar Yadav, King George’s Medical University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Deepak Sethi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abeer M Shawky, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA