Peer Review History: Agriculture Productivity and Economic Growth in India: An Ardl Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Associate Professor, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA.

(2) Dr.  Ridzwan Che Rus, Associate Professor, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

(3) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, Professor, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

(4) Dr. Olcay Çolak, Associate Professor, Uşak University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Raj Kumar Yogi, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, India.

(2) Nazeerudin, Bangalore University, India.

(3) Kristamtini, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bambang Surya Adji Syahputra, Panca Budi University, Indonesia.

(2) Hussein M. TRABOULSI, Lebanese University, Lebanon.

(3) P. Divakar Reddy, PJTSAU, India.

(4) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raj Kumar Yogi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nazeerudin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Kristamtini, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_4_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Predictors and Outcome of in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in Emergency Department Suez Canal University Hospitals

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V. V. Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

(2) Dr. Francesco Pelliccia, Professor, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Christina Tsitsimpikou, Greece.

(2) Amira Mahmoud Abd-Elmonem, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Christina Tsitsimpikou, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amira Mahmoud Abd-Elmonem, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contemporary Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Levels in Perspective: Self-reported Survey

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nikolaos D. Bagis, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Indah Suciati, Alkhairaat University, Indonesia.

(2) Dejene Girma Denbel, Dilla University, Ethiopia.

(3) Ana Purwitasari, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Belgin Bal İncebacak, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey.

(2) Franco Blezza, “Gabriele d’Annunzio” University, Italy.

(3) Ivy H. Casupanan, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines.

(4) Jverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

(5) Robert Kati, Kibabii University, Kenya.

(6) Sulaiman Adamu Mayanchi, Zamfara State College of Education, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Indah Suciati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dejene Girma Denbel, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ana Purwitasari, Germany) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Developing a Test to Measure the Knowledge Level of Farmers towards Market Intelligence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kwong Fai Andrew Lo, Professor & Dean, Institute of Earth Science, College of Science, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Kumar Baliyan, Giri Institute of Development Studies, India.

(2) Flavio Andrew do Nascimento Santos, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

(3) Siddique E Azam, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sandeep Kumar Baliyan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Flavio Andrew do Nascimento Santos, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Siddique E Azam, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge Level of Farmers in Accessing Agricultural Information through Smartphone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Arpita Sharma Kandpal,  India.

(2) Pravin Natthu Chavhan,  India.

(3) Bhagirath Das, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Martins Olusegun Orifah, Federal University Dutse, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Arpita Sharma Kandpal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pravin Natthu Chavhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Bhagirath Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural Practices and Environmental Degradation in Santa Sub-division, North West Region of Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armando Garcia Chiang, Professor, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Shiva Kumar, University of Mysore, India.

(2) João Luiz de Moraes Hoefel, UNIFAAT University Centre, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (D. Shiva Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (João Luiz de Moraes Hoefel, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Variability and Scope of Response to Selection in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Naú Silverio Niño Gutiérrez, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Mexico.

(2) Netrapal Sharma, Kumaun University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) George Omoto, Kenya.

(2) Joseph Adjebeng-Danquah, Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Ghana.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Naú Silverio Niño Gutiérrez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Netrapal Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Financial Inclusion in India: A Regional and District Level Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ivan Markovic, University of Nis, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Claudio Zancan, Universidade Federal Do Paraná – UFPR, Brazil.

(2) Ismael Rezaeinejad, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Claudio Zancan, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ismael Rezaeinejad, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Performance of Coconut Production in Global Scenario: A Quin-decadal Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Suleiman Iguda Ladan, Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Sergiy Lavrenko, Kherson State Agrarian and Economic University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suleiman Iguda Ladan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sergiy Lavrenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Their Management by Antioxidants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Leila Zarepour, Iran University of Medical Science, Iran.

(2) Prasanta Kumar MItra, Sikkim Manipal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Leila Zarepour, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prasanta Kumar MItra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA