Peer Review History: Effect of Different Sources and Levels of Zinc on the Nutrient Content, Uptake and Fertility Status of Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hashem Aram, Shiraz University, Iran.

(2) Sundus Malik, Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, The University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hashem Aram, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sundus Malik, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.] Genotypes for Yield & Its Attributing Traits under Terai Agro-climatic Zone of West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharti O.P, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Akm Quamruzzaman, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharti O.P, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akm Quamruzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey of Parasitic Nematodes Associated with Cotton in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tarekegn Mengistu, Dilla University, Ethiopia.

(2) Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, Manipur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tarekegn Mengistu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Using Plant Fiber on The Properties of Concrete

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kumar Kotturi, Assistant Professor, Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology (Autonomous), Hyderabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Suresh, VSB Engineering College, India.

(2) Thuany Espírito Santo de Lima, Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Brazil.

(3) NA Abdulla, University of Salahaddin, Iraq.

(4) Zainab Sabah Rasoul, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thuany Espírito Santo de Lima, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (NA Abdulla, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Zainab Sabah Rasoul, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Continuous Data Quality Improvement in Enterprise Data Governance: A Model for Best Practices and Implementation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Assistant Professor,B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

(2) Dorcas Folasade Oyebode, Purdue University Northwest, United States.

(3) Rianat Abbas, Baylor University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dorcas Folasade Oyebode, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rianat Abbas, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Early English Exposure for Rural Left-Behind Children: Integrating Home-Kindergarten Collaboration and Learning Qualities Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Padma Prasad Khatiwada, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Ranjit Kumar Elamadurthi, Vardhaman College of Engineering, India.

(3) Ssimbwa Peter, Nkumba University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Padma Prasad Khatiwada, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjit Kumar Elamadurthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ssimbwa Peter, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advancements in Nanotechnology for Enhancing Post-Harvest Handling and Storage of Horticultural Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vimal Kumar, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Syed Ali Hassan, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vimal Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Ali Hassan, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Organic Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) in Obio Akpa, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Assistant professor,Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Forkwa Etienne Yong, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(2) Devi Andriani Luta, University Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Forkwa Etienne Yong, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Devi Andriani Luta, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Potentials of Phytochemicals in Combatting Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Noor Saber Jawad, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(2) Godwin Mmaduabuchi Ikokwu, University of Benin, Nigeria.

(3) Eda Altinoz, Kastamonu University, Turkiye.

(4) Dennis Jack Opwoko, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.

(5) Rupa Verma, Ranchi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noor Saber Jawad, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Godwin Mmaduabuchi Ikokwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eda Altinoz, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Dennis Jack Opwoko, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Rupa Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Noor Saber Jawad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Various Levels of Phosphorus and Plant Spacing on the Growth and Yield of Black Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Reda E. Essa, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Mulugeta Abebe, Wachemo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reda E. Essa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mulugeta Abebe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA