Peer Review History: Efficacy and Economics of Certain Insecticides and Neem oil against Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Famobuwa Olaniyi Edward, Adeyemi Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Sharad Vats, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Seema Tripathy, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) Daisy Myint, Ministry of Agriculture, Myanmar.

(3) Jose R. Pires Manso, University of Beira Interior, Portugal.

(4) Emam Hossain, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(5) Ioana Grozea, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, Romania.

(6) Pedro Saúl Castillo Carrillo, Universidad Nacional de Tumbes, Perú.

(7) Sachin Kumar, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Famobuwa Olaniyi Edward, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sharad Vats, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Soil Carbon Sequestration and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Agroforestry Systems in Kogi East Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anthony R. Lupo, Professor, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

(2) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Professor, National United University, Taiwan.

(3) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Manik H. Kalubarme, India Space Research Organization, India.

(2) Dalia Mohamed Fahmy Mubarak, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Asramid Yasin, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manik H. Kalubarme, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dalia Mohamed Fahmy Mubarak, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Asramid Yasin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioherbicide Effect of Effluent from Processed Manihot esculentus Tubers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Prathyusha Engineering College, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arshad Javaid, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

(2) Ajay Kumar Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bilal Ahmad Khan, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

(2) Luis Angel Cruz Ortiz, Universidad Autonoma de Chiapas, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Arshad Javaid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ajay Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Use of Scheimpflug Tomography and OCT Tomography to Examine Corneal Dimensional and Anterior Chamber Depth before and after LASIK Surgery

Editor(s):

(1) Tatsuya Mimura, Associate Professor, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chen Ai-Hong, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

(2) O E Babalola, Rachel Eye Center, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Chen Ai-Hong, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (O E Babalola, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Current and Emerging Laboratory Techniques for Malaria Diagnosis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dharmesh Chandra Sharma, Madhur Pathology, M K Plasa, Katora Tal  Chauraha, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maulana Yusuf Alkandahri, Karawang University, Indonesia.

(2) Vivek Agrawal, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maulana Yusuf Alkandahri, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vivek Agrawal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Repercussion of Seed Treatment with Bio-fertilizers, Bio-stimulants, Botanicals on Plant Growth & Yield Attributes Traits of Black Mustard (Brassica nigra L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

(2) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

(3) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Carmine Boniello, University of Salerno, Italy.

(2) Lenin Quiñones Huatangari, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(3) Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Universitaria Agustiniana, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carmine Boniello, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lenin Quiñones Huatangari, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Colombia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Nitrogen and Sulphur on Growth Attribute, Yield and Yield Attribute of Mustard (Brassica juncea) Prayagraj Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Hannah Selvakumari A, Periyar  University, India.

(2) Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Technical Agricultural College, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suad Alsaedi, Ministry of Science and Technology, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hannah Selvakumari A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Carbon Footprints and Conventional Rice Cultivation; A Case Study in Thanjavur District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) J.P.H.U. Jayaneththi, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) Rose Alani, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

(3) Rakesh Kumar Atri, University of Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Subhendu Adhikari, Regional Research Centre, ICAR-Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR-CIFA), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (J.P.H.U. Jayaneththi, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rose Alani, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rakesh Kumar Atri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints in Adoption of Intercropping in Horticultural Crops among Farmers of Haryana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogesh Kumar Agarwal, Forest Research Centre for Eco-Rehabilitation, India.

(2) Munish Sharma, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary & Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ram Ratan Singh, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Celal Cevher, Field Crops Central Researcher Institute, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yogesh Kumar Agarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Munish Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pesticide Consumption Trends in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pankaj Kumar Mandal, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Tukamushaba John Wence, Busoga University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Borozan Aurica, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pankaj Kumar Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tukamushaba John Wence, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA