Peer Review History: Comprehensive Review on SWAT for Sustainable Agriculture and Climatic Solutions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Manal Abdel Rahman Sorour, Food Technology Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gavit B.K, Dr. ASCAE & T, India.

(2) Mulatu Abayicho Sulamo, Jinka University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gavit B.K, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mulatu Abayicho Sulamo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Spray Parameters of a UAV Sprayer on Droplet Size in Paddy Spraying

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Padamata Ramesh Babu, Bapatla Engineering College, India.

(2) Gurrala Madhusudhana Rao, Vagdevi Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Padamata Ramesh Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gurrala Madhusudhana Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of the Impact of Low Tunnel Technology on Farm Income of Bottle Gourd Growers in the Bikaner District of Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) G. K. Bhabhor, Anand Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ashutosh Gupta, Bharuwa Agri Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. K. Bhabhor, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashutosh Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Determinants of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Children living with Epilepsy in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sachin Kumar Jain, Principal, Oriental College of Pharmacy & Research, Oriental University, MP, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahendra Dwivedi, Maharana Pratap School of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Reza Azizimalamiri, Golestan Medical, Educational, and Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Virendra Kushwaha, GSVM Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahendra Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reza Azizimalamiri, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Virendra Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hydrological Modeling of Krishna Upper Catchment Area of India Using Multisite Calibration and Validation of SWAT Model

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Ahmed Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Victoria Ningthoujam, National Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Athiwat Phinyoyang, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Victoria Ningthoujam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Athiwat Phinyoyang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Blockchain-enhanced Cloud Security Frameworks: Addressing Human-network Vulnerabilities in Public and Private Sector Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Rohith Bhat, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and technical Sciences, Saveetha University, India.

(2) Chirag Mavani, United States.

(3) Aditya Kumar Sahu, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, India.

(4) Mohd Hafizuddin Bin Ibrahim, Politeknik Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia.

(5) N Krishnamoorthy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Rohith Bhat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chirag Mavani, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aditya Kumar Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mohd Hafizuddin Bin Ibrahim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (N Krishnamoorthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Weed Dynamics and Soil Health as Influenced by Tillage Method and Establishment Method in Small Millets

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) G Naveen Kumar, S.V Agricultural College, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rameshwar Rai, Madan Bhandari University of Science and Technology, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G Naveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rameshwar Rai, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Maximizing Productivity and Profitability of Rice through Crop Establishment Methods and Weed Management Practices in Winter Rice-Garden Pea Relay Cropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bonface O. Manono, Extension Professor, Colorado State University, Office of Engagement and Extension, USA Senior Lecturer, South Eastern Kenya University, Kenya.

(2) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sameer Mahapatro, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Gue Arsene, Universite Jean Lorougnon Guede, Cote d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sameer Mahapatro, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gue Arsene, Cote d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Herbicidal Weed Management on Crop Growth, Weed Density, Weed Biomass, Yield and Economics of Direct Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa L.): A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jakkula Vijay, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) Aashish Gyawali, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jakkula Vijay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aashish Gyawali, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysing Efficacy of Chemical and Mechanical Weed Control Methods to Growth and Quality Enhancement in Grapes (Vitis vinifera)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Angus Onwudiwe Ikeh, University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Nigeria.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Shiv Kumar Shivandu, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angus Onwudiwe Ikeh, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shiv Kumar Shivandu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA